Despite growth in the field of gerontological research over the past 50 years, no consensus has emerged on either the definition of gerontology or on its scope and boundaries. This confusion is rooted historically in developments involving the origins and adoption of the term. These include the divergent agendas and world views of particular disciplines and gerontological institutions, as well as conflicts over both ideology and turf among major gerontologists. Speculation is offered on the potential, as well as the costs, of developing consensus-in the future.
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 26 citations exist upstream.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.