Natural Frequency, Duration, and Intensity of Vowels in Reading

Abstract

No AccessJournal of Speech and Hearing DisordersArticle1 Sep 1949Natural Frequency, Duration, and Intensity of Vowels in Reading John W. Black John W. Black Google Scholar https://doi.org/10.1044/jshd.1403.216 SectionsAboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In Additional Resources FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited by Journal of the American Academy of Audiology32:07 (445-463)1 Jul 2021Waveform Amplitude and Temporal Symmetric/Asymmetric Characteristics of Phoneme and Syllable Segments in the W-1 Spondaic Words Recorded by Four SpeakersRichard H. Wilson and Nancy J. Scherer Journal of Phonetics87 (101063)1 Jul 2021A dual mechanism for intrinsic f0Wei-Rong Chen, D.H. Whalen and Mark K. Tiede Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology42:2 (51-61)3 Apr 2017Dynamic measures of voice stability in young and old adultsStephen D. Bier, Catherine I. Watson and Clare M. McCann American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology24:3 (460-469)1 Aug 2015Variation in Vowel Duration Among Southern African American English SpeakersYolanda Feimster Holt, Ewa Jacewicz and Robert Allen Fox Language and Speech57:2 (238-253)1 Jun 2014Durations of American English Vowels by Native and Non-native Speakers: Acoustic Analyses and Perceptual EffectsChang Liu, Su-Hyun Jin and Chia-Tsen Chen James M. Hillenbrand (2013) Static and Dynamic Approaches to Vowel Perception Vowel Inherent Spectral Change10.1007/978-3-642-14209-3_2 Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research54:5 (1284-1294)1 Oct 2011Effects of Computer System and Vowel Loading on Measures of NasalanceShaheen N. Awan, Kristin Omlor and Christopher R. Watts English Language and Linguistics17:2 (29-60)1 Aug 2011포먼트 분포와 궤적에 따른 미국영어 후설저모음융합의 지역적 특징 Choong-Yon Park Studies in Second Language Acquisition30:011 Mar 2008FACTORS AFFECTING THE PRODUCTION OF VIETNAMESE TONES: A Study of American LearnersHanh thi Nguyen and Marlys A. Macken The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America109:2 (748-763)1 Feb 2001Effects of consonant environment on vowel formant patternsJames M. Hillenbrand, Michael J. Clark and Terrance M. Nearey The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America108:6 (3013-3022)1 Dec 2000Some effects of duration on vowel recognitionJames M. Hillenbrand, Michael J. Clark and Robert A. Houde The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America105:6 (3509-3523)1 Jun 1999Identification of resynthesized /hVd/ utterances: Effects of formant contourJames M. Hillenbrand and Terrance M. Nearey Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research41:5 (1158-1170)1 Oct 1998Prosodic Markers of Syntactic Boundaries in the Speech of 4-Year-Old Children With Normal and Disordered Language DevelopmentDavid Snow Journal of Voice9:3 (282-289)1 Sep 1995Patterns of fundamental frequency for three types of voice samplesThomas Murry, William S. Brown and Richard J. Morris Journal of Phonetics23:3 (349-366)1 Jan 1995The universality of intrinsic F0 of vowelsD.H. Whalen and Andrea G. Levitt Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research37:4 (831-840)1 Aug 1994Phrase-Final Syllable Lengthening and Intonation in Early Child SpeechDavid Snow Journal of Communication Disorders24:1 (51-58)1 Feb 1991The use of an autochromatic tuner for the measurement of vocal fundamental frequencyLarry C. Solberg, Linda P. Fowler and Virginia G. Walker Journal of Communication Disorders14:2 (123-125)1 Mar 1981Clinical estimation of fundamental frequency: The 3m plastiform magnetic tape viewerDan H. Kelly and Frank E. Sansone Journal of Phonetics6:3 (177-189)1 Jul 1978Intrinsic fundamental frequency of Danish vowelsNiels Reinholt Petersen JEAN-MARIE HUMBERT (1978) Consonant Types, Vowel Quality, and Tone11I am grateful to the members of the tone seminar at ULCA and the members of the Phonology Laboratory at Berkeley for their help and comments. My special thanks to V. Fromkin, J. Gandour, L. Goldstein, L. Hyman, H. Javkin, P. Ladefoged, I. Maddieson, M. Mazaudon, B. Michailovsky, J. Ohala, and R. Schuh for very helpful discussions and criticisms of this work. This research was supported in part by NSF Grants made to the Phonetics Laboratory, Department of Linguistics, UCLA, and to the Phonology Laboratory, Department of Linguistics, UCB. Tone10.1016/B978-0-12-267350-4.50008-X Richard Luchsinger and Gottfried E. Arnold (1970) Physiologie der Sprachlaute Handbuch der Stimm- und Sprachheilkunde10.1007/978-3-7091-7130-1_11 Speech Monographs35:2 (196-200)1 Jun 1968Relative intra‐nasal sound intensities of vowelsMartin F. Schwartz Gottfried E. Arnold (1959) Die Sprache und ihre Störungen Lehrbuch der Stimm- und Sprachheilkunde10.1007/978-3-7091-3462-7_2 Review of Educational Research22:2 (102-115)1 Apr 1952Chapter V: SpeechFranklin H. Knower Speech Monographs17:1 (90-94)1 Mar 1950An experimental study of the relative identification thresholds of nine American vowelsE. Thayer Curry Volume 14Issue 3September 1949Pages: 216-221 Get Permissions Add to your Mendeley library History Published in issue: Sep 1, 1949 Metrics Topicsasha-topicsasha-article-typesCopyright & PermissionsCopyright © 1949 American Speech-Language-Hearing AssociationPDF downloadLoading ...

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 44 citations exist upstream.