No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
Computer-mediated communication and scholarly discourse 231 E.g. line 2 for LINGUIST-discussion 1 is to be interpreted in the following way: There were 3 discussants who contributed 1 message each to this discussion (which is 18,75% of all contributions to this discussion) and there was one contributor who received only one reference (which is 16,6% of all references in this discussion).2 I did not break down the results by gender of participants, because the number of female participants in each discussion was too small to allow generalisations (from 6 participants in LINGUISTdiscussion 1 only one was female; from 21 participants in LINGUISTI-discussion 2 although only 1 was female (in three cases no definite decision about gender of the contributor was possible); in the ETHNOdiscussion three from fourteen participants were female.Thus, the results presented here may reflect a male bias (cf.section 4).
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 45 citations exist upstream.
Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.