SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
How and Why People Accept Personality Feedback
0 references·6 citing·22 second hop
How and Why People Accept Personality Feedback (1980)How and Why People Accept Personality Fee…Pigeonholing or learning instrument? (2019)Pigeonholing or learning inst…Literature review of research and practice in collaborative assessment. (2002)Literature review of research…Evaluation of self-relevant information: Acceptance of favourable and unfavourable personality statements as feedback vs test items (1997)Evaluation of self-relevant i…Acceptance of personality questionnaire feedback: The role of individual difference variables and source of interpretation (1996)Acceptance of personality que…Feedback motivation and reactions to personality interpretations that differ in favorability and accuracy. (1986)Feedback motivation and react…Comparison of Computerized versus Standardized Feedback and Accurate versus Inaccurate Feedback (1982)Comparison of Computerized ve…Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. (1979)Unrealistic optimism about future life events. (1980)Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. (1988)A Theory of Social Comparison Processes (1954)Mind, Self, and Society (2015)Human Nature and the Social Order (2017)Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic (1989)“Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct” (2000)Psychological testing and psychological assessment: A review of evidence and issues. (2001)The Comprehensive Psychological Assessment (2009)Building a Bridge of Trust: Collaborative Assessment With a Person With Serious Mental Illness (2012)Handbook for the sixteen personality factor questionnaire (16 PF) (1970)Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. (1979)Advances in Psychological Assessment (1984)Évaluer une pratique d'orientation professionnelle pour adultes: les effets individuels du bilan de compétences (2001)“Hey, This is not like me!” Convergent validity and personal validation of computerized personality reports (2013)The acceptability of "fake" versus "bona fide" personality test interpretations. (1955)A further look at student acceptance of general personality interpretations. (1972)The Seventh Mental Measurements Yearbook (1973)An alternative "description of personality": The Big-Five factor structure. (1990)Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking (2005)Transfer of Training: A Meta-Analytic Review (2009)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 1996Acceptance of personality questionnaire feedback: The role of individual difference variables and source of interpretation11 cited
  • 2002Literature review of research and practice in collaborative assessment.10 cited
  • 1986Feedback motivation and reactions to personality interpretations that differ in favorability and accuracy.7 cited
  • 1997Evaluation of self-relevant information: Acceptance of favourable and unfavourable personality statements as feedback vs test items5 cited
  • 1982Comparison of Computerized versus Standardized Feedback and Accurate versus Inaccurate Feedback4 cited
  • 2019Pigeonholing or learning instrument?4 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work