SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Post-Publication Peer Review: Opening Up Scientific Conversation
1 references·16 citing·50 second hop
Post-Publication Peer Review: Opening Up Scientific Conversation (2012)Post-Publication Peer Review: Opening Up …Here comes everybody: the power of organizing without organizations (2008)Here comes everybody: the pow…Post-publication Peer Review with an Intention to Uncover Data/Result Irregularities and Potential Research Misconduct in Scientific Research: Vigilantism or Volunteerism? (2023)Post-publication Peer Review …Reimagining the peer‐review system for translational health science journals (2021)Reimagining the peer‐review s…Open collaborative writing with Manubot (2019)Open collaborative writing wi…Peer review in forensic science (2017)Peer review in forensic scien…Evidence appraisal: a scoping review, conceptual framework, and research agenda (2017)Evidence appraisal: a scoping…The case of #arseniclife: Blogs and Twitter in informal peer review (2016)The case of #arseniclife: Blo…Fortifying the Corrective Nature of Post-publication Peer Review: Identifying Weaknesses, Use of Journal Clubs, and Rewarding Conscientious Behavior (2016)Fortifying the Corrective Nat…Altmetric: Top 50 dental articles in 2014 (2016)Altmetric: Top 50 dental arti…Web indicators for research evaluation. Part 2: Social media metrics (2015)Web indicators for research e…Open Access Publishing: A Literature Review (2015)Open Access Publishing: A Lit…Using science and psychology to improve the dissemination and evaluation of scientific work (2014)Using science and psychology …The Vacuum Shouts Back: Postpublication Peer Review on Social Media (2014)The Vacuum Shouts Back: Postp…Current and Evolving Models of Peer Review (2014)Current and Evolving Models o…A Stronger Post-Publication Culture Is Needed for Better Science (2014)A Stronger Post-Publication C…The need for post-publication peer review in plant science publishing (2013)The need for post-publication…An emerging consensus for open evaluation: 18 visions for the future of scientific publishing (2012)An emerging consensus for ope…Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science (2013)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)An Overview of Post-Publication Peer Review (2021)Post-publication critique at top-ranked journals across scientific disciplines: a cross-sectional assessment of policies and practice (2022)Persistence of Contradicted Claims in the Literature (2007)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Social Media Release Increases Dissemination of Original Articles in the Clinical Pain Sciences (2013)The academic tweet: Twitter as a tool to advance academic surgery (2018)Presence of social media mentions for vascular surgery publications is associated with an increased number of literature citations (2020)Multi-Stage Open Peer Review: Scientific Evaluation Integrating the Strengths of Traditional Peer Review with the Virtues of Transparency and Self-Regulation (2012)Tracking Replicability as a Method of Post-Publication Open Evaluation (2012)A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review (2017)Does open peer review improve citation count? Evidence from a propensity score matching analysis of PeerJ (2020)Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank (2013)Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)The need for a formalised system of Quality Control for environmental policy-science (2017)Ten strategies for avoiding and overcoming authorship conflicts in academic publishing (2021)Enhancing the review process in global environmental assessments: The case of the IPCC (2022)Can Tweets Predict Citations? Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact (2011)Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services (2013)The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management (2015)Social networking for scientists: an analysis on how and why academics use ResearchGate (2017)Does the public discuss other topics on climate change than researchers? A comparison of explorative networks based on author keywords and hashtags (2019)Altmetrics and societal impact measurements: Match or mismatch? A literature review (2020)Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics (1969)Looking Beyond Traditional Metrics in Orthodontics: An Altmetric Study on the Most Discussed Articles on the Web (2017)Altmetric analysis of the contemporary scientific literature in Endodontology (2019)Antibiotics: A Bibliometric Analysis of Top 100 Classics (2020)The Impact Factor Game (2006)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Why Science Is Not Necessarily Self-Correcting (2012)Challenges to open peer review (2018)Do Legitimate Publishers Benefit or Profit from Error, Misconduct or Fraud? (2021)Sustained Rise in Retractions in the Life Sciences Literature during the Pandemic Years 2020 and 2021 (2022)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises (1998)Quality Systems—Medical Devices—Particular Requirements for the Application of ISO 9001 (2004)Cognitive biases in the peer review of bullet and cartridge case comparison casework: A field study (2020)Collective intelligence in fingerprint analysis (2020)Firearm examination: Examiner judgments and computer‐based comparisons (2020)Open Access (2012)How open science helps researchers succeed (2016)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Streamlining data-intensive biology with workflow systems (2021)Not just for programmers: How GitHub can accelerate collaborative and reproducible research in ecology and evolution (2023)A publishing infrastructure for Artificial Intelligence (AI)-assisted academic authoring (2024)Business Models, Business Strategy and Innovation (2009)Citizen Science and Volunteered Geographic Information: Overview and Typology of Participation (2012)The Contradictory Influence of Social Media Affordances on Online Communal Knowledge Sharing (2013)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2008Here comes everybody: the power of organizing without organizations2,323 cited

Cited by

  • 2015Web indicators for research evaluation. Part 2: Social media metrics78 cited
  • 2019Open collaborative writing with Manubot71 cited
  • 2014A Stronger Post-Publication Culture Is Needed for Better Science60 cited
  • 2016Altmetric: Top 50 dental articles in 201460 cited
  • 2017Peer review in forensic science52 cited
  • 2012An emerging consensus for open evaluation: 18 visions for the future of scientific publishing48 cited
  • 2014The Vacuum Shouts Back: Postpublication Peer Review on Social Media41 cited
  • 2016Fortifying the Corrective Nature of Post-publication Peer Review: Identifying Weaknesses, Use of Journal Clubs, and Rewarding Conscientious Behavior39 cited
  • 2014Current and Evolving Models of Peer Review36 cited
  • 2015Open Access Publishing: A Literature Review35 cited
  • 2016The case of #arseniclife: Blogs and Twitter in informal peer review35 cited
  • 2017Evidence appraisal: a scoping review, conceptual framework, and research agenda30 cited
  • 2023Post-publication Peer Review with an Intention to Uncover Data/Result Irregularities and Potential Research Misconduct in Scientific Research: Vigilantism or Volunteerism?29 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2014Using science and psychology to improve the dissemination and evaluation of scientific work26 cited
  • 2013The need for post-publication peer review in plant science publishing25 cited
  • 2021Reimagining the peer‐review system for translational health science journals24 cited