Same-Handed and Mirrored Unit Configurations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Despite growing awareness that hospital design can impact meaningful outcomes, the same-handed medical-surgical inpatient unit configuration has not been empirically investigated. This study measured differences in patient and nurse outcomes between the same-handed and mirrored unit configurations. BACKGROUND: It has been hypothesized that the same-handed unit configuration may contribute to operational efficiencies, fewer adverse events, and reduced noise levels. METHODS: A natural experiment of 8 medical-surgical inpatient units used 2 questionnaires developed for the study. The first questionnaire was available to registered nurses. The second was available to the nurses' patients. RESULTS: Compared with participants on the mirrored unit configuration, participants on the same-handed unit configuration reported lower noise levels, better sleep quality, more frequent approaches to patients' right side, and improved satisfaction with organization of the workspace at patients' bedsides. The increased right-side approach was related to fewer instances of patients catching themselves from falling. CONCLUSION: The same-handed unit configuration benefits patient experience, patient safety, and operational outcomes. Before renovation or new construction of units, nurse executives should consider the advantages of a same-handed unit configuration.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 19 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.