SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Evidence synthesis, economics and public policy
16 references·1 citing·37 second hop
Evidence synthesis, economics and public policy (2010)Evidence synthesis, economics and public …Economic Evaluation in Clinical Trials (2014)Economic Evaluation in Clinic…GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness (2011)GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating t…GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency (2011)GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating t…GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision (2011)GRADE guidelines 6. Rating th…Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)Systematic reviews: CRD's gui…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta‐Analyses (2008)Analysing Data and Undertakin…Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences (2006)Systematic Reviews in the Soc…Evidence-based Policy (2006)Evidence-based PolicyDecision Modelling For Health Economic Evaluation (2006)Decision Modelling For Health…Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions (2005)Realist review - a new method…Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes (2005)Methods for the Economic Eval…Making choices in health: who guide to cost-effectiveness analysis (2004)Making choices in health: who…The green book : appraisal and evaluation in central government (2003)The green book : appraisal an…Evidence-based Policy: The Promise of `Realist Synthesis' (2002)Evidence-based Policy: The Pr…The Handbook of Research Synthesis. (1995)The Handbook of Research Synt…Behavioural and cognitive-behavioural group-based parenting programmes for early-onset conduct problems in children aged 3 to 12 years (2012)Behavioural and cognitive-beh…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Case Study Research: Design and Methods (1984)The theory of planned behavior (1991)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews (2014)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies (2018)External validity of randomised controlled trials: “To whom do the results of this trial apply?” (2005)Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis (2014)Evaluating the Quality of Evidence from a Network Meta-Analysis (2014)CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis (2020)GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence (2011)GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias) (2011)A Realist Theory of Science. (1977)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)62. Realism with a Human Face (2011)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)The Discovery of Grounded Theory (2017)The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36 (2002)Recommendations for Conduct, Methodological Practices, and Reporting of Cost-effectiveness Analyses (2016)Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder (2012)GRADE guidelines 26: informative statements to communicate the findings of systematic reviews of interventions (2019)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. (2003)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)Purposeful Sampling in Qualitative Research Synthesis (2011)Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review (2017)Model Parameter Estimation and Uncertainty Analysis (2012)Model Parameter Estimation and Uncertainty: A Report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-6 (2012)Modeling Good Research Practices—Overview: A Report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-1 (2012)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
  • 2005Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes13,647 cited
  • 1995The Handbook of Research Synthesis.3,643 cited
  • 2006Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences3,582 cited
  • 2010Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care3,245 cited
  • 2005Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions3,187 cited
  • 2006Decision Modelling For Health Economic Evaluation3,144 cited
  • 2011GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision2,681 cited
  • 2011GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency2,318 cited
  • 2011GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness1,838 cited
  • 2008Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta‐Analyses1,795 cited
  • 2006Evidence-based Policy1,789 cited
  • 2003The green book : appraisal and evaluation in central government1,417 cited
  • 2004Making choices in health: who guide to cost-effectiveness analysis1,259 cited
  • 2014Economic Evaluation in Clinical Trials910 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2002
Evidence-based Policy: The Promise of `Realist Synthesis'
729 cited

Cited by

  • 2012Behavioural and cognitive-behavioural group-based parenting programmes for early-onset conduct problems in children aged 3 to 12 years107 cited