SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The Quality of Business Ethics Journals
16 references·8 citing·46 second hop
The Quality of Business Ethics Journals (2013)The Quality of Business Ethics JournalsComparing the expert survey and citation impact journal ranking methods: Example from the field of Artificial Intelligence (2011)Comparing the expert survey a…What's familiar is excellent: The impact of exposure effect on perceived journal quality (2010)What's familiar is excellent:…Knowledge dissemination in operations management: Published perceptions versus academic reality (2010)Knowledge dissemination in op…Erratum to: Globalizing Business Ethics Research and the Ethical Need to Include the Bottom-of-the-Pyramid Countries: Redefining the Global Triad as Business Systems and Institutions (2010)Erratum to: Globalizing Busin…Business Ethics Journal Rankings as Perceived by Business Ethics Scholars (2010)Business Ethics Journal Ranki…Globalizing Business Ethics Research and the Ethical Need to Include the Bottom-of-the-Pyramid Countries: Redefining the Global Triad as Business Systems and Institutions (2009)Globalizing Business Ethics R…A Comprehensive Analysis of Marketing Journal Rankings (2009)A Comprehensive Analysis of M…A citation-based ranking of the business ethics scholarly journals (2009)A citation-based ranking of t…Caveats for the use of citation indicators in research and journal evaluations (2007)Caveats for the use of citati…A Scientometric Investigation into the Validity of IS Journal Quality Measures (2007)A Scientometric Investigation…Examining accounting departments’ rankings of the quality of accounting journals (2005)Examining accounting departme…The Benefits and Drawbacks of Impact Factor for Journal Collection Management in Libraries (2004)The Benefits and Drawbacks of…Business and Society and Business Ethics Journals: A Citation and Impact Analysis (2004)Business and Society and Busi…Impact factors: use and abuse. (2003)Impact factors: use and abuse.A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of Journal Rankings: The Case of Formal Lists (2000)A Theoretical and Empirical A…Perspectives on publishing (1976)Perspectives on publishingHow significant is corporate social responsibility to business research? (2020)How significant is corporate …Evaluating journal quality by integrating department journal lists in a developing country: Are they representative? (2019)Evaluating journal quality by…Protocol: Is there agreement or disagreement between the absolute and relative impact indices obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus data? (2018)Protocol: Is there agreement …Global Ranking of Management- and Clinical-Centered eHealth Journals (2017)Global Ranking of Management-…Comparison of US and UK rankings of LIS journals (2017)Comparison of US and UK ranki…Fairness in the Institutional Valuation of Business Journals1 (2015)Fairness in the Institutional…Enabling Ethical Code Embeddedness in Construction Organizations: A Review of Process Assessment Approach (2015)Enabling Ethical Code Embedde…An assessment of accounting journal quality based on departmental lists (2014)An assessment of accounting j…Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Intellectual capital: an exploratory study that develops measures and models (1998)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)A scientometric analysis of the Proceedings of the McMaster World Congress on the Management of Intellectual Capital and Innovation for the 1996‐2008 period (2009)The Role of Governments in the Business and Society Debate (2015)Corporate Social Responsibility and Employee Outcomes: A Moderated Mediation Model of Organizational Identification and Moral Identity (2017)Problems of citation analysis: A critical review (1989)INTERPRETIVE AND CRITICAL RESEARCH IN ACCOUNTING: A COMMENTARY ON ITS ABSENCE FROM MAINSTREAM ACCOUNTING RESEARCH (1997)Radical Developments in Accounting Thought (2005)Measuring the impact of accounting journals using Google Scholar and the g-index (2009)Ranking accounting journals using dissertation citation analysis: A research note (2009)Drivers of citations: An analysis of publications in “top” accounting journals (2017)Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests (1951)Construct validity in psychological tests. (1955)Validation Guidelines for IS Positivist Research (2004)Investigating the use of "Grounded Theory" in information systems research (2008)Profiling grounded theory approaches in information systems research (2011)Robotics in Nursing: A Bibliometric Analysis (2018)The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors (1966)Increasing Productivity through Performance Appraisal (1981)Exploring Diversity in Accounting through Faculty Journal Perceptions* (2003)Analyzing project management research: Perspectives from top management journals (2008)Networks for the commercialization of innovations: A review of how divergent network actors contribute (2014)Reliability: A Review of Psychometric Basics and Recent Marketing Practices (1979)The Structural Influence of Marketing Journals: A Citation Analysis of the Discipline and its Subareas over Time (2003)The role of social network websites in the consumer–brand relationship (2014)Geometric journal impact factors correcting for individual highly cited articles (2015)What are the top five journals in economics? A new meta-ranking (2017)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Theory and practise of the g-index (2006)Does an expert-based evaluation allow us to go beyond the Impact Factor? Experiences from building a ranking of national journals in Poland (2017)National Lists of Scholarly Publication Channels: An Overview and Recommendations for Their Construction and Maintenance (2020)The Strength of Weak Ties (1973)The New production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies (1995)How are new citation‐based journal indicators adding to the bibliometric toolbox? (2009)Caveats for the journal and field normalizations in the CWTS (“Leiden”) evaluations of research performance (2010)Turning the tables on citation analysis one more time: Principles for comparing sets of documents (2011)How Much Better Are the Most-Prestigious Journals? The Statistics of Academic Publication (2005)Women in interdisciplinary science: Exploring preferences and consequences (2006)Does Sample Size Matter in Qualitative Research?: A Review of Qualitative Interviews in is Research (2013)Personal Versus Market Logics of Control: A Historically Contingent Theory of the Risk of Acquisition (2001)Assessing scientific research performance and impact with single indices (2009)The skewed few: people and papers of quality in management studies (2011)Five‐year impact factor data in the Journal Citation Reports (2009)Research Quality Rankings of Heterodox Economic Journals in a Contested Discipline (2010)Citation-Based Journal Rankings: Key Questions, Metrics, and Data Sources (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2003Impact factors: use and abuse.500 cited
  • 2007Caveats for the use of citation indicators in research and journal evaluations209 cited
  • 2000A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of Journal Rankings: The Case of Formal Lists157 cited
  • 2005Examining accounting departments’ rankings of the quality of accounting journals127 cited
  • 1976Perspectives on publishing81 cited
  • 2011Comparing the expert survey and citation impact journal ranking methods: Example from the field of Artificial Intelligence80 cited
  • 2009A citation-based ranking of the business ethics scholarly journals77 cited
  • 2009A Comprehensive Analysis of Marketing Journal Rankings76 cited
  • 2007A Scientometric Investigation into the Validity of IS Journal Quality Measures64 cited
  • 2004The Benefits and Drawbacks of Impact Factor for Journal Collection Management in Libraries59 cited
  • 2010What's familiar is excellent: The impact of exposure effect on perceived journal quality51 cited
  • 2010Knowledge dissemination in operations management: Published perceptions versus academic reality49 cited
  • 2010Business Ethics Journal Rankings as Perceived by Business Ethics Scholars42 cited
  • 2004Business and Society and Business Ethics Journals: A Citation and Impact Analysis37 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2009Globalizing Business Ethics Research and the Ethical Need to Include the Bottom-of-the-Pyramid Countries: Redefining the Global Triad as Business Systems and Institutions29 cited
  • 2010Erratum to: Globalizing Business Ethics Research and the Ethical Need to Include the Bottom-of-the-Pyramid Countries: Redefining the Global Triad as Business Systems and Institutions25 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2020How significant is corporate social responsibility to business research?42 cited
    • 2015Fairness in the Institutional Valuation of Business Journals122 cited
    • 2014An assessment of accounting journal quality based on departmental lists15 cited
    • 2015Enabling Ethical Code Embeddedness in Construction Organizations: A Review of Process Assessment Approach14 cited
    • 2017Global Ranking of Management- and Clinical-Centered eHealth Journals14 cited
    • 2019Evaluating journal quality by integrating department journal lists in a developing country: Are they representative?11 cited
    • 2017Comparison of US and UK rankings of LIS journals10 cited
    • 2018Protocol: Is there agreement or disagreement between the absolute and relative impact indices obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus data?9 cited