An Assessment of Public Administration Journals: The Perspective of Editors and Editorial Board Members

John P. Forrester · Sheilah S. Watson

92 citations0/0 files storedPublic Administration Review

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Publishing and Scholarly Communication scientometrics and bibliometrics research Academic Writing and Publishing

Abstract

John P. Forrester, Sheilah S. Watson, An Assessment of Public Administration Journals: The Perspective of Editors and Editorial Board Members, Public Administration Review, Vol. 54, No. 5 (Sep. - Oct., 1994), pp. 474-482

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 92 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2000On Improving Qualitative Methods in Public Administration Research 2011Survey Research in Public Administration: Assessing Mainstream Journals with a Total Survey Error Framework 2012Towards a multidimensional model for evaluating electronic government: Proposing a more comprehensive and integrative perspective 2006An Assessment of Criminal Justice and Criminology Journal Prestige∗2018Clarification of research design, research methods, and research methodology 2010Trends of e-Government Research. Contextualization and Research Opportunities 2012The Evolution of Internal IT Applications and e-Government Studies in Public Administration 2001Public Administration Research from a Practitioner Perspective

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.