Collusion in Ocean Shipping: A Test of Monopoly and Empty Core Models

Abstract

In markets with avoidable fixed costs, the core may be empty. I argue that a reason for collusion is to impose an equilibrium where none exists. I set up a framework for deriving testable implications from the model and compare those implications with those of a cartel model. I compare the two models empirically with data from liner shipping conferences, legal collusive agreements that have been in force for over a century, and I conclude that the evidence supports the theory of the core.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 119 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.