SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis
16 references·6 citing·30 second hop
Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (2011)Systematic Reviews and Meta-AnalysisThe PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Repo…The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Repo…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Relative Citation Impact of Various Study Designs in the Health Sciences (2005)Relative Citation Impact of V…LITERATURE SEARCHING FOR RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS USED IN COCHRANE REVIEWS: RAPID VERSUS EXHAUSTIVE SEARCHES (2003)LITERATURE SEARCHING FOR RAND…Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Meta-analysis of Observationa…The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)The Hazards of Scoring the Qu…Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Improving the quality of repo…meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies (1998)meta-analysis bias in locatio…Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German (1997)Language bias in randomised c…Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists (1995)Assessing the quality of rand…Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Publication bias in clinical …The Medical Review Article: State of the Science (1987)The Medical Review Article: S…Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)Primary, Secondary, and Meta-…Systematic reviews of the literature: a better way of addressing basic science controversies (2018)Systematic reviews of the lit…Developing, Conducting, and Publishing Appropriate Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Articles (2017)Developing, Conducting, and P…The Aesthetic Surgery Literature: Do Plastic Surgeons Remain at the Cutting Edge? (2016)The Aesthetic Surgery Literat…Systematically reviewing the literature: building the evidence for health care quality. (2015)Systematically reviewing the …Offspring of parents with chronic pain (2015)Offspring of parents with chr…Conducting a successful systematic review of the literature, part 2 (2014)Conducting a successful syste…The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses (2010)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Standard Quality Assessment Criteria for Evaluating Primary Research Papers from a Variety of Fields (2004)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies (2013)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence‐Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review (2003)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)A Nonparametric "Trim and Fill" Method of Accounting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. (2006)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.44,857 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement37,549 cited
  • 2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration28,094 cited
  • 2000Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting20,612 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement19,577 cited
  • 2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration10,345 cited
  • 1976Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research4,889 cited
  • 1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
  • 1991Publication bias in clinical research3,110 cited
  • 1999The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis1,981 cited
  • 1998meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies1,370 cited
  • 1995Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists1,306 cited
  • 1997Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German1,029 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

1987
The Medical Review Article: State of the Science
857 cited
  • 2003LITERATURE SEARCHING FOR RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS USED IN COCHRANE REVIEWS: RAPID VERSUS EXHAUSTIVE SEARCHES693 cited
  • 2005Relative Citation Impact of Various Study Designs in the Health Sciences497 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2015Offspring of parents with chronic pain130 cited
    • 2018Systematic reviews of the literature: a better way of addressing basic science controversies31 cited
    • 2014Conducting a successful systematic review of the literature, part 222 cited
    • 2015Systematically reviewing the literature: building the evidence for health care quality.19 cited
    • 2017Developing, Conducting, and Publishing Appropriate Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Articles12 cited
    • 2016The Aesthetic Surgery Literature: Do Plastic Surgeons Remain at the Cutting Edge?11 cited