The Episodicity of Verbal Reports of Personally Significant Autobiographical Memories: Vividness Correlates with Narrative Text Quality More than with Detailedness or Memory Specificity

Tilmann Habermas · Verena Diel

64 citations0/0 files storedFrontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Identity, Memory, and Therapy Memory Processes and Influences Cognitive Functions and Memory

Abstract

How can we tell from a memory report whether a memory is episodic or not? Vividness is required by many definitions, whereas detailedness, memory specificity, and narrative text type are competing definitions of episodicity used in research. We explored their correlations with vividness in personally significant autobiographical memories to provide evidence to support their relative claim to define episodic memories. In addition, we explored differences between different memory types and text types as well as between memories with different valences. We asked a lifespan sample (N = 168) of 8-, 12-, 16-, 20-, 40-, and 65-year-olds of both genders (N = 27, 29, 27, 27, 28, 30) to provide brief oral life narratives. These were segmented into thematic memory units. Detailedness of person, place, and time did not correlate with each other or either vividness, memory specificity, or narrative text type. Narrative text type, in contrast, correlated both with vividness and memory specificity, suggesting narrative text type as a good criterion of episodicity. Emotionality turned out to be an even better predictor of vividness. Also, differences between narrative, chronicle, and argument text types and between specific versus more extended and atemporal memories were explored as well as differences between positive, negative, ambivalent, neutral, contamination, and redemption memory reports. It is concluded that temporal sequentiality is a central characteristic of episodic autobiographical memories. Furthermore, it is suggested that the textual quality of memory reports should be taken more seriously, and that evaluation and interpretation are inherent aspects of personally significant memories.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 64 citations exist upstream.

References

2010Development and Distortion of Malaysian Public- Private Partnerships: Patronage, Privatised Profits and Pitfalls DOI: 10.1111/j.1467- 8500.2009.00655.x 1991Acts of meaning 2000The construction of autobiographical memories in the self-memory system.1997Narrative Analysis: Oral Versions of Personal Experience1 2000Getting a life: The emergence of the life story in adolescence.2007Autobiographical memory specificity and emotional disorder.2004The Emergence of Autobiographical Memory: A Social Cultural Developmental Theory.2003Interpreting the magnitudes of correlation coefficients.

Cited by

2015Development of Temporal Macrostructure in Life Narratives Across the Lifespan 2018Emotion and Narrative 2018Mentalizing oneself: detecting reflective functioning in life narratives 2020Specificity and detail in autobiographical memory retrieval: a multi-site (re)investigation 2015A model of psychopathological distortions of autobiographical memory narratives: an emotion narrative view

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.