SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Randomized Controlled Trials In Endourology: A Quality Assessment
16 references·0 citing·30 second hop
Randomized Controlled Trials In Endourology: A Quality Assessment (2013)Randomized Controlled Trials In Endourolo…Evidence synthesis as the key to more coherent and efficient research (2009)Evidence synthesis as the key…Endorsement of the CONSORT statement by high impact medical journals: survey of instructions for authors (2005)Endorsement of the CONSORT st…Adequacy and reporting of allocation concealment: review of recent trials published in four general medical journals (2005)Adequacy and reporting of all…Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group (2003)Updated method guidelines for…Updated Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group (2003)Updated Method Guidelines for…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2003)The CONSORT statement: revise…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revise…Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Assessing the quality of cont…Assessing the Quality of Randomized Trials (1999)Assessing the Quality of Rand…Methodology and Reports of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (1998)Methodology and Reports of Sy…Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Improving the quality of repo…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the Quality of Repo…Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Assessing the quality of repo…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. D…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical Evidence of BiasAssessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists (1995)Assessing the quality of rand…Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Improving the Reporting Quality of Nonrandomized Evaluations of Behavioral and Public Health Interventions: The TREND Statement (2004)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial (1981)More Informative Abstracts Revisited (1990)How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study (2003)Guidelines for Systematic Review in Conservation and Environmental Management (2006)Sex Differences in Insomnia: A Meta-Analysis (2006)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (1987)Interrater Reliability of the Modified Jadad Quality Scale for Systematic Reviews of Alzheimer’s Disease Drug Trials (2001)Correlation of Quality Measures With Estimates of Treatment Effect in Meta-analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (2002)Recommendations by Cochrane Review Groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies (2008)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Scales to Assess the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review (2007)2009 Updated Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group (2009)The Pittsburgh sleep quality index as a screening tool for sleep dysfunction in clinical and non-clinical samples: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2015)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?17,580 cited
  • 1995Empirical Evidence of Bias5,632 cited
  • 1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
  • 1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
  • 2001Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials3,309 cited
  • 1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials2,754 cited
  • 2003Updated Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group2,179 cited
  • 1995Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists1,306 cited
  • 1999Assessing the Quality of Randomized Trials649 cited
  • 1998Methodology and Reports of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses534 cited
  • 2003The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials258 cited
  • 2005Endorsement of the CONSORT statement by high impact medical journals: survey of instructions for authors178 cited
  • 2005

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Adequacy and reporting of allocation concealment: review of recent trials published in four general medical journals
176 cited
  • 2003Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group155 cited
  • 2009Evidence synthesis as the key to more coherent and efficient research94 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.