SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Secretive and Subjective, Peer Review Proves Resistant to Study · Study

WorkSecretive and Subjective, Peer Review Proves Resistant to Study

Jennifer Couzin-Frankel2013

Work2013

Secretive and Subjective, Peer Review Proves Resistant to Study

Jennifer Couzin-Frankel

25 citations·0/0 files stored·Science

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Publishing and Scholarly Communication Academic Writing and Publishing Academic Publishing and Open Access

Abstract

A recent meeting on biomedical publishing underscores how tough it is to study the peer-review process.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 25 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2022Can transparency undermine peer review? A simulation model of scientist behavior under open peer review 2021Social Network Positions, Peer Effects, and Evaluation Updating: An Experimental Test in the Entrepreneurial Context 2022Progressive and degenerative journals: on the growth and appraisal of knowledge in scholarly publishing 2015Is three better than one? simulating the effect of reviewer selection and behavior on the quality and efficiency of peer review 2015The peer review process: a primer forJNISreaders

Details

Year2013

Typeother

Published2013-09-19

VenueScience

ISSN-L0036-8075

Languageen

Citations25

Files0 public / 0

ShelfPublishing and Scholarly Communication

Identifiers

doi10.1126/science.341.6152.1331

openalex_workW2079387779

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.