Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Empirical Evidence of an Association Between Internal Validity and Effect Size in Randomized Controlled Trials of Low-Back Pain

15 references·13 citing·33 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?17,580 cited
1995Empirical Evidence of Bias5,632 cited
1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
1998Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?3,560 cited
2001Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials3,309 cited
1998The Delphi List2,379 cited
2003Updated Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group2,179 cited
1999The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis1,981 cited
2000Methods for Meta-Analysis in Medical Research1,795 cited
2005Imputing missing standard deviations in meta-analyses can provide accurate results1,567 cited
1995A random‐effects regression model for meta‐analysis883 cited
1997Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group for Spinal Disorders735 cited
2002Correlation of Quality Measures With Estimates of Treatment Effect in Meta-analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials473 cited
1990An empirical study of the possible relation of treatment differences to quality scores in controlled randomized clinical trials

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

241 cited

1984Nonparametric estimators of effect size in meta-analysis.158 cited

Cited by

2017Common versus specific factors in psychotherapy: opening the black box198 cited
2012Cost-Effectiveness of Nonpharmacologic, Nonsurgical Interventions for Hip and/or Knee Osteoarthritis: Systematic Review94 cited
2018Influence of blinding on treatment effect size estimate in randomized controlled trials of oral health interventions86 cited
2014Assessment of Methodologic Quality of Randomized Trials of Interventional Techniques: Development of an Interventional Pain Management Specific Instrument85 cited
2016Empirical evaluation of which trial characteristics are associated with treatment effect estimates84 cited
2020Sample size, study length, and inadequate controls were the most common self-acknowledged limitations in manual therapy trials: A methodological review41 cited
2017Impact of Selection Bias on Treatment Effect Size Estimates in Randomized Trials of Oral Health Interventions: A Meta-epidemiological Study40 cited
2023The impact of blinding on trial results: A systematic review and meta‐analysis35 cited
2014Sample size, effect size, and statistical power: a replication study of Weisburd’s paradox33 cited
2011Reliability of 3 Assessment Tools Used to Evaluate Randomized Controlled Trials for Treatment of Neck Pain25 cited
2012The quality of reporting might not reflect the quality of the study: implications for undertaking and appraising a systematic review17 cited
2015The effect of journal impact factor, reporting conflicts, and reporting funding sources, on standardized effect sizes in back pain trials: a systematic review and meta-regression17 cited
2013How should we evaluate the risk of bias of physical therapy trials?: a psychometric and meta-epidemiological approach towards developing guidelines for the design, conduct, and reporting of RCTs in Physical Therapy (PT) area: a study protocol15 cited