SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The Implications of High Court Docket Control for Resource Allocation and Legal Efficiency
12 references·2 citing·40 second hop
The Implications of High Court Docket Control for Resource Allocation and Legal Efficiency (2010)The Implications of High Court Docket Con…The Politics of Judicial Review (2019)The Politics of Judicial Revi…Reversal, Dissent, and Variability in State Supreme Courts: The Centrality of Jurisdictional Source (2008)Reversal, Dissent, and Variab…Case Selection and the Study of Judicial Politics (2008)Case Selection and the Study …A Principal-Agent Theory of En Banc Review (2007)A Principal-Agent Theory of E…Engendering Democratic Transition from Conflict: Women's Inclusion in Northern Ireland's Peace Process (2006)Engendering Democratic Transi…The Constitutional Adjudication Mosaic of Latin America (2005)The Constitutional Adjudicati…The politics of judicial review in Chile in the era of democratic transition, 1990–2002 (2003)The politics of judicial revi…Strategic Auditing in a Political Hierarchy: An Informational Model of the Supreme Court's Certiorari Decisions (2000)Strategic Auditing in a Polit…The Dynamics and Determinants of the Decision to Grant En Banc Review (1999)The Dynamics and Determinants…Sophisticated voting and gate-keeping in the supreme court (1999)Sophisticated voting and gate…The choices justices make (1997)The choices justices makeDeciding to decide: agenda setting in the United States Supreme Court (1992)Deciding to decide: agenda se…Panel selection on high courts (2015)Panel selection on high courtsIs Bigger Always Better? On Optimal Panel Size, with Evidence from the Supreme Court of Canada (2011)Is Bigger Always Better? On O…The Art of Political Manipulation, by William H. Riker (1987)Organized Interests and Agenda Setting in the U.S. Supreme Court (1988)Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices (1989)Comparing Attitudinal and Strategic Accounts of Dissenting Behavior on the U.S. Courts of Appeals (2003)Selective Exposure to Campaign Communication: The Role of Anticipated Agreement and Issue Public Membership (2008)Why (And When) Judges Dissent: A Theoretical And Empirical Analysis (2011)Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting (2000)Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–1999 (2002)The Supreme Court and the attitudinal model revisited (2003)Examining the efficiency of the U.S. courts of appeals: Pathologies and prescriptions (2011)Left, Right, and Center: Strategic Information Acquisition and Diversity in Judicial Panels (2011)Strategic Anticipation of En Banc Review in the U.S. Courts of Appeals (2016)A Re-assessment of the Concept of Political Support (1975)The third wave: democratization in the late twentieth century (1992)The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century (1992)Constitutionalism, Judiciary, and Democracy in Islamic Societies (2007)COURTS AND POLITICAL PARTIES: THE POLITICS OF CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW IN ECUADOR (2010)Institutionalized Police Brutality: Torture, the Militarization of Security, and the Reform of Inquisitorial Criminal Justice in Mexico (2020)The Estimation of Choice Probabilities from Choice Based Samples (1977)The New Economics of Organization (1984)The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model (1993)Bargaining and Opinion Assignment on the US Supreme Court (2007)The Value of Vagueness: Delegation, Defiance, and Judicial Opinions (2008)The Supreme Court's Many Median Justices (2012)The Selection of Disputes for Litigation (1984)Extracting Policy Positions from Political Texts Using Words as Data (2003)Attitudinal and Neo-Institutional Models of Supreme Court Decision Making: An Empirical and Comparative Perspective from Israel (2011)Ideological influences on governance and regulation: The comparative case of supreme courts (2017)Precedent and Doctrine in a Complicated World (2017)Judicial Review in New Democracies (2003)Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics: A Research Agenda (2004)Judging from a Guilty Conscience: The Chilean Judiciary's Human Rights Turn (2010)A Sociology of Transnational Constitutions: Social Foundations of the Post-National Legal Structure (2016)Whistleblowing and Compliance in the Judicial Hierarchy (2014)Courting the President: How Circuit Court Judges Alter Their Behavior for Promotion to the Supreme Court (2015)The Legitimacy of the United States Supreme Court in a Polarized Polity (2006)The Politics of Principle: The First South African Constitutional Court, 1995-2005 (2013)The Political Orientation of the Members of the Hungarian Constitutional Court between 2010 and 2014 (2016)Repeat Players in the Supreme Court: The Role of Experienced Lawyers in Litigation Success (1995)Friends of the Court: Examining the Influence of Amicus Curiae Participation in U.S. Supreme Court Litigation (2004)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1997The choices justices make794 cited
  • 2000Strategic Auditing in a Political Hierarchy: An Informational Model of the Supreme Court's Certiorari Decisions262 cited
  • 1992Deciding to decide: agenda setting in the United States Supreme Court256 cited
  • 1999Sophisticated voting and gate-keeping in the supreme court169 cited
  • 2005The Constitutional Adjudication Mosaic of Latin America103 cited
  • 1999The Dynamics and Determinants of the Decision to Grant En Banc Review97 cited
  • 2007A Principal-Agent Theory of En Banc Review68 cited
  • 2003The politics of judicial review in Chile in the era of democratic transition, 1990–200262 cited
  • 2019The Politics of Judicial Review55 cited
  • 2008Case Selection and the Study of Judicial Politics53 cited
  • 2006Engendering Democratic Transition from Conflict: Women's Inclusion in Northern Ireland's Peace Process48 cited
  • 2008Reversal, Dissent, and Variability in State Supreme Courts: The Centrality of Jurisdictional Source20 cited

Cited by

  • 2011Is Bigger Always Better? On Optimal Panel Size, with Evidence from the Supreme Court of Canada16 cited
  • 2015Panel selection on high courts13 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work