Dependency and Development in Latin America

Abstract

The theory of imperialist capitalism, as is well known, has so far attained its most significant treatment in Lenin’s works. This is not only because Lenin attempts to explain transformations of the capitalist economies that occurrred during the last decade of the nineteenth century and the first decade of the twentieth, but is mainly because of the political and historical implications contained in his interpretations. In fact, the descriptive arguments of Lenin’s theory of imperialism were borrowed from Hobson’s analysis. Other writers had already presented evidence of the international expansion of the capitalist economies and nations. Nevertheless, Lenin, inspired by Marx’s views, was able to bring together evidence to the effect that economic expansion is meaningless if we do not take into consideration the political and historical aspects with which economic factors are intimately related. From Lenin’s perspective, imperialism is a new form of the capitalist mode of production. This new form cannot be considered a different mode of economic organization, insofar as capital accumulation based on private ownership of the means of production and exploitation of the labor force remain the basic features of the system. But its significance is that of a new stage of capitalism.

Cite this

Michael Monteón, Fernando Henríque Cardoso, Enzo Faletto V., Marjory Mattingly Urquidi (1979). Dependency and Development in Latin America. The History Teacher. https://doi.org/10.2307/492408

@article{michael1979dependency,
  title  = {Dependency and Development in Latin America},
  author = {Monteón, Michael and Cardoso, Fernando Henríque and V., Enzo Faletto and Urquidi, Marjory Mattingly},
  year   = {1979},
  journal = {The History Teacher},
  doi    = {10.2307/492408}
}

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 1,639 citations exist upstream.

Cited by