References

• 1979Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk48,459 cited
• 1988Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk32,475 cited
• 1956A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth24,458 cited
• 1983An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.21,368 cited
• 1964CAPITAL ASSET PRICES: A THEORY OF MARKET EQUILIBRIUM UNDER CONDITIONS OF RISK*19,431 cited
• 1992Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty15,457 cited
• 1952PORTFOLIO SELECTION*13,480 cited
• 1993Discretion versus policy rules in practice9,059 cited
• 1985A Theory of the Term Structure of Interest Rates8,333 cited
• 1983Staggered prices in a utility-maximizing framework7,892 cited
• 1965The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets7,600 cited
• 1975THE VALUATION OF RISK ASSETS AND THE SELECTION OF RISKY INVESTMENTS IN STOCK PORTFOLIOS AND CAPITAL BUDGETS**This paper is another in a series of interrelated theoretical and statistical studies of corporate financial and investment policies being made under grants from the Rockefeller Foundation, and more recently the Ford Foundation, to the Harvard Business School. The generous support for this work is most gratefully acknowledged. The author is also much indebted to his colleagues Professors Bishop, Christenson, Kahr, Raiffa, and (especially) Schlaifer, for extensive discussion and commentary on an earlier draft of this paper; but responsibility for any errors or imperfections remains strictly his own.[Professor Sharpe's paper, “Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions of Risk” (Journal of Finance, September 1964) appeared after this paper was in final form and on its way to the printers. My first section, which parallels the first half of his paper (with corresponding conclusions), sets the algebraic framework for sections II, III and VI, (which have no counterpart in his paper) and for section IV on the equilibrium prices of risk assets, concerning which our results differ significantly for reasons which will be explored elsewhere. Sharpe does not take up the capital budgeting problem developed in section V below.]