Ockham and Buridan on Simple Supposition

Claude Panaccio

25 citations0/0 files storedVivarium

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Medieval Philosophy and Theology Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation Philosophy and Theoretical Science

Abstract

Abstract What is at stake, philosophically, in the disagreement between Ockham and Buridan is whether there is simple (or material) supposition in the mental language or not. The key difference is that Ockham’s theory allows for the possibility of use/mention ambiguities within mental language, while Buridan’s approach, whatever it is exactly, does not.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 25 citations exist upstream.

References

1974Ockham's Rule of Supposition: Two Conflicts in His Theory 2004Guillaume d'Ockham et la suppositio materialis

Cited by

2016Logic in the Latin Thirteenth Century 2016Propositions: Their Meaning and Truth 2016Obligationes

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.