Reliability of reviews for the American Psychologist: A biostatistical assessment of the data.Domenic V. Cicchetti1980-01-01articleAmerican Psychologist160 citationsclosedNo readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.Psychology Research and BibliometricsMeta-analysis and systematic reviewsReliability and Agreement in MeasurementAbstractNo abstract was published for this record.Citations in this libraryStored only when both papers are in the corpus — 160 citations exist upstream.References1960A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales1968Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit.1973The Equivalence of Weighted Kappa and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient as Measures of Reliability1966The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient as a Measure of Reliability1969Large sample standard errors of kappa and weighted kappa.1959Publication Decisions and their Possible Effects on Inferences Drawn from Tests of Significance—or Vice Versa1976On various intraclass correlation reliability coefficients.1971Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee systemCited by1989The Peer Review Process Used to Evaluate Manuscripts Submitted to Academic Journals1981Interjudgmental reliability of reviews for the Journal of Educational Psychology.1983Interrater agreement for reviews for Developmental Review1985A critique of Whitehurst's "Interrater agreement for journal manuscript reviews": De omnibus, disputandem est.1982When will the editors start to edit?1994Evaluating Peer Reviews1990Peer review at the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft2006A new reader trial approach to peer review in funding research grants: An Australian experiment