Health and Home Environments of Caregivers of Children Investigated by Child Protective Services

Amelia L. Burgess · Iris Wagman Borowsky

24 citations0/0 files storedPEDIATRICS

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Child Welfare and Adoption Child Abuse and Trauma Family and Disability Support Research

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The goal was to describe the mental and physical health of caregivers and the home environments of children who have been investigated by child protective services (CPS). METHODS: Subjects were 5299 children 0 to 14 years of age, from the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-being, a cohort study of children investigated by CPS. The Short-Form Health Survey was used to measure mental and physical health. The Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment-Short Form (HOME-SF) total and cognitive stimulation subscale scores were used to measure developmentally appropriate characteristics of children's home environments. These validated measures were compared across placement types, that is, remaining at home (investigated home), nonrelative foster care (foster care), and relative foster care (kin care). RESULTS: Kin and foster caregivers had better-than-average mental health, but 11% to 13% of kin/foster caregivers and 24% of investigated-home caregivers had scores consistent with untreated mental illness. All caregivers had worse-than-average physical health; 25% of foster and 26% of kin caregivers had scores consistent with serious physical illness. There was no significant difference in mean HOME-SF scores between foster and investigated homes. Kin care homes of 6- to-10-year-old children were superior to investigated and foster homes. All setting types had more homes in the lowest quartile than in the highest quartile for HOME-SF and cognitive stimulation subscale scores. CONCLUSIONS: A sizable minority of children investigated by CPS subsequently live in homes with mentally or physically ill caregivers and with developmentally inadequate nurturing and stimulation. Foster homes are indistinguishable from investigated homes on the HOME-SF. Clinicians should assess the mental and physical health of caregivers and should facilitate access to appropriate resources, including parent/caregiver training programs.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 24 citations exist upstream.

References

1996A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey 1998Cross-Validation of Item Selection and Scoring for the SF-12 Health Survey in Nine Countries 2008A Meta-analytic Review of Components Associated with Parent Training Program Effectiveness 1997A shorter form health survey: can the SF-12 replicate results from the SF-36 in longitudinal studies?1992Family preservation using multisystemic therapy: An effective alternative to incarcerating serious juvenile offenders.2004Parent-Child Interaction Therapy With Physically Abusive Parents: Efficacy for Reducing Future Abuse Reports.1995Multisystemic treatment of serious juvenile offenders: Long-term prevention of criminality and violence.2001The Home Environments of Children in the United States Part II: Relations with Behavioral Development through Age Thirteen

Cited by

2021Kinship Care and Child Protection in High-Income Countries: A Scoping Review 2013Social and familial determinants of health: Mediating effects of caregiver mental and physical health on children's mental health

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.