Article1995

Witness confidence and witness accuracy: Assessing their forensic relation.

207 citations0/0 files storedPsychology Public Policy and Law

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

Jury Decision Making Processes Memory Processes and Influences Deception detection and forensic psychology

Abstract

Jurors overbelieve eyewitnesses, have difficulty reliably differentiating accurate from inaccurate eyewitnesses, and are not adequately sensitive to aspects of witnessing and identification conditions. A major source of juror unreliability is reliance on witness confidence, a dubious indicator of ey

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 207 citations exist upstream.

References

1979Accuracy, confidence, and juror perceptions in eyewitness identification.1988Juror decision making in eyewitness identification cases.1990Juror sensitivity to eyewitness identification evidence.

Cited by

2009The Repair of Trust: A Dynamic Bilateral Perspective and Multilevel Conceptualization 2007Silence speaks volumes: The effectiveness of reticence in comparison to apology and denial for responding to integrity- and competence-based trust violations.1999"I'm innocent!": Effects of training on judgments of truth and deception in the interrogation room.2012Receiver operating characteristic analysis of eyewitness memory: Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of simultaneous versus sequential lineups.2002Interviewing techniques and the assessment of statement credibility 2008The benefits of knowing what you know (and what you don’t): How calibration affects credibility 2011Accuracy, confidence, and calibration: How young children and adults assess credibility.2020The role of decision confidence in advice-taking and trust formation.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.