SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The Use and Valuation of Journals in Planning Scholarship: Peer Assessment versus Impact Factors
13 references·9 citing·45 second hop
The Use and Valuation of Journals in Planning Scholarship: Peer Assessment versus Impact Factors (2010)The Use and Valuation of Journals in Plan…Compact, Diffuse, or Would-be Discipline? (2006)Compact, Diffuse, or Would-be…Trends in the Usage of ISI Bibliometric Data: Uses, Abuses, and Implications (2005)Trends in the Usage of ISI Bi…Toward Greater Heights for Planning: Reconciling the Differences between Profession, Practice, and Academic Field (2005)Toward Greater Heights for Pl…Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods (2005)Fatal attraction: Conceptual …The Journal “Impact Factor” (1998)The Journal “Impact Factor”Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Why the impact factor of jour…The Contingent Valuation Debate: Why Economists Should Care (1994)The Contingent Valuation Deba…Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better than No Number? (1994)Contingent Valuation: Is Some…An Alliance Confirmed Planning Literature and the Social Sciences (1990)An Alliance Confirmed Plannin…Problems of citation analysis: A critical review (1989)Problems of citation analysis…Citation ranking versus subjective evaluation in the determination of journal hierachies in the social sciences (1982)Citation ranking versus subje…Comparison of peer and citation assessment of the influence of scientific journals (1980)Comparison of peer and citati…Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Citation Analysis as a Tool i…In Defense of the Generalist Journal (2020)In Defense of the Generalist …Why Do Some Articles in Planning Journals Get Cited More than Others? (2019)Why Do Some Articles in Plann…The Tensions of Transparency in Urban and Environmental Planning (2019)The Tensions of Transparency …Do subjective journal ratings represent whole journals or typical articles? Unweighted or weighted citation impact? (2017)Do subjective journal ratings…Correlation Between Perception-Based Journal Rankings and the Journal Impact Factor (JIF): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2017)Correlation Between Perceptio…The role of the scholar in times of crisis (2016)The role of the scholar in ti…Faculty Performance Evaluation Using Citation Analysis (2016)Faculty Performance Evaluatio…Citation Rate of Highly-Cited Papers in 100 Kinesiology-Related Journals (2015)Citation Rate of Highly-Cited…The Authenticity of Spatial Planning Knowledge (2012)The Authenticity of Spatial P…If planning is everything, maybe it's nothing (1973)Cities of tomorrow: an intellectual history of urban planning and design in the twentieth century (1989)The Idea of a University (1992)Planning’s Core Curriculum: Knowledge, Practice, and Implementation (2011)Educating planners in Europe: A review of 21st century study programmes (2014)Game On: Exploring the Effectiveness of Game-based Learning (2020)Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction (1992)The Cost of Price Incentives: An Empirical Analysis of Motivation Crowding-Out (1997)Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress (2011)Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies (2017)Networks of Scientific Papers (1965)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior (2008)Science Citation Index (1970)Social Stratification in Science (1974)Journal-to-journal citation data: Issues of validity and reliability (1989)Trends of e-Government Research. Contextualization and Research Opportunities (2010)An overview of scholarly research on public e-services? A meta-analysis of the literature (2014)Citation Indexing-Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities (1980)Scholarly communication and bibliometrics (2002)A Comparative Citation Analysis of Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar (2008)The Matilda Effect—Role Congruity Effects on Scholarly Communication (2011)Using the h-index to measure the quality of journals in the field of business and management (2011)Measuring Values of Extramarket Goods: Are Indirect Measures Biased? (1979)Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method (1989)Contingent Valuation: A User's Guide (2000)Hypothetical bias, choice experiments and willingness to pay (2010)Cents and Sensibility: Economic Valuation and the Nature of “Nature” (2011)American Economic Review (2019)The Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of Innovation (1990)Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups (2006)Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review (2008)University research funding and publication performance—An international comparison (2010)Causal relationship between article citedness and journal impact (1994)Counting on citations: a flawed way to measure quality (2003)A Bibliometric Analysis (2005)Causes for the Persistence of Impact Factor Mania (2014)Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)Publishing by—and for?—the Numbers (1990)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)O papel da informetria e da cienciometria e sua perspectiva nacional e internacional (1998)Ways of constructing research questions: gap-spotting or problematization? (2010)From market fixing to market-creating: a new framework for innovation policy (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1972Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation2,781 cited
  • 1997Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research2,444 cited
  • 1994Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better than No Number?1,927 cited
  • 1994The Contingent Valuation Debate: Why Economists Should Care852 cited
  • 1989Problems of citation analysis: A critical review803 cited
  • 2005Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods764 cited
  • 1998The Journal “Impact Factor”206 cited
  • 2005Trends in the Usage of ISI Bibliometric Data: Uses, Abuses, and Implications199 cited
  • 2005Toward Greater Heights for Planning: Reconciling the Differences between Profession, Practice, and Academic Field76 cited
  • 1982Citation ranking versus subjective evaluation in the determination of journal hierachies in the social sciences70 cited
  • 1980Comparison of peer and citation assessment of the influence of scientific journals48 cited
  • 2006Compact, Diffuse, or Would-be Discipline?23 cited
  • 1990An Alliance Confirmed Planning Literature and the Social Sciences18 cited

Cited by

  • 2017Do subjective journal ratings represent whole journals or typical articles? Unweighted or weighted citation impact?

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

33 cited
  • 2017Correlation Between Perception-Based Journal Rankings and the Journal Impact Factor (JIF): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis23 cited
  • 2016Faculty Performance Evaluation Using Citation Analysis22 cited
  • 2019Why Do Some Articles in Planning Journals Get Cited More than Others?21 cited
  • 2015Citation Rate of Highly-Cited Papers in 100 Kinesiology-Related Journals19 cited
  • 2020In Defense of the Generalist Journal17 cited
  • 2019The Tensions of Transparency in Urban and Environmental Planning16 cited
  • 2012The Authenticity of Spatial Planning Knowledge16 cited
  • 2016The role of the scholar in times of crisis6 cited