Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Vasovagal donor reactions: An important issue with implications for the blood supply

8 references·9 citing·29 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1995Severe outcomes of allogeneic and autologous blood donation: frequency and characterization214 cited
1999A case‐controlled multicenter study of vasovagal reactions in blood donors: influence of sex, age, donation status, weight, blood pressure, and pulse208 cited
1980A Study of Criteria for Blood Donor Deferral104 cited
1992Moderate and severe reactions in blood donors97 cited
2002Vasovagal reactions in high school students: findings relative to race, risk factor synergism, female sex, and non‐high school particpants92 cited
1987Blood donation by the elderly. Clinical and policy considerations80 cited
2002Vasovagal reactions in apheresis donors67 cited
1991Characteristics of elderly blood donors39 cited

Cited by

2006Blood volume regulation in donors undergoing intermittent‐flow plasmapheresis involving a high extracorporeal blood volume15 cited
2009Prevalence of immediate vasovagal reaction in blood donors visiting two blood banks of Karachi14 cited
2012Increasing regular donors through a psychological approach which reduces the onset of vasovagal reactions13 cited
2007Do we really know the real risks of apheresis donation?12 cited
2003It's time to end RBC shortages12 cited
2006Understanding the donor can correct the nation's blood imbalance

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

11 cited

2004Complications of Blood Donation: Manual and Automated Collection Procedures9 cited

2005What’s happening: An overview of potential adverse reactions associated with apheresis technology8 cited

2003Safety of donating multiple products in a single apheresis collection: Are we expecting too much?8 cited