SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Toward Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy
10 references·7 citing·36 second hop
Toward Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy (2003)Toward Complete and Accurate Reporting of…Value of Flow Diagrams in Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials (2001)Value of Flow Diagrams in Rep…Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials (2001)Use of the CONSORT Statement …The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement…The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)The CONSORT Statement: Revise…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revise…Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests (1999)Empirical Evidence of Design-…Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (1997)Uniform requirements for manu…Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Improving the quality of repo…Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research. Getting better but still not good (1995)Use of methodological standar…Disease, Level of Impact, and Quality of Research Methods (1992)Disease, Level of Impact, and…Reporting of imaging diagnostic accuracy studies with focus on MRI subgroup: Adherence to STARD 2015 (2017)Reporting of imaging diagnost…Review of Research Reporting Guidelines for Radiology Researchers (2016)Review of Research Reporting …How to Critically Appraise the Clinical Literature (2014)How to Critically Appraise th…Reporting Experiments in Homeopathic Basic Research—Description of the Checklist Development (2009)Reporting Experiments in Home…Reporting experiments in homeopathic basic research (REHBaR) – A detailed guideline for authors (2009)Reporting experiments in home…Quality of reporting of test accuracy studies in reproductive medicine: impact of the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) initiative (2006)Quality of reporting of test …Critically assessing the radiology literature1 (2004)Critically assessing the radi…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Optimal cut-off score for diagnosing depression with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9): a meta-analysis (2011)Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies: The CHARMS Checklist (2014)Screening for anxiety disorders with the GAD-7 and GAD-2: a systematic review and diagnostic metaanalysis (2015)Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research (1963)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. (2003)Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review (2006)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)CONSORT Revised—Improving the Reporting of Randomized Trials (2001)A multidimensional meta-analysis of psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder (2004)The effects of excluding patients from the analysis in randomised controlled trials: meta-epidemiological study (2009)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)The Introduction and Evaluation of MRI in Japan (1994)Measuring the effects of imaging: An evaluative framework (1995)Proposals for a Phased Evaluation of Medical Tests (2009)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Properties of the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve for diagnostic test data (2002)Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies (2006)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials5,372 cited
  • 2001The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration3,828 cited
  • 1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials2,545 cited
  • 1999Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests1,860 cited
  • 2001Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials1,026 cited
  • 1995Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research. Getting better but still not good711 cited
  • 1997Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors358 cited
  • 2001Value of Flow Diagrams in Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials316 cited
  • 1992Disease, Level of Impact, and Quality of Research Methods105 cited

Cited by

  • 2017Reporting of imaging diagnostic accuracy studies with focus on MRI subgroup: Adherence to STARD 201559 cited
  • 2009Reporting experiments in homeopathic basic research (REHBaR) – A detailed guideline for authors43 cited
  • 2006Quality of reporting of test accuracy studies in reproductive medicine: impact of the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) initiative

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

37 cited
  • 2004Critically assessing the radiology literature122 cited
  • 2009Reporting Experiments in Homeopathic Basic Research—Description of the Checklist Development18 cited
  • 2014How to Critically Appraise the Clinical Literature15 cited
  • 2016Review of Research Reporting Guidelines for Radiology Researchers11 cited