SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Improving the Clarity and Transparency of Reporting Health Research: a Shared Obligation and Responsibility
12 references·6 citing·42 second hop
Improving the Clarity and Transparency of Reporting Health Research: a Shared Obligation and Responsibility (2008)Improving the Clarity and Transparency of…Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials (2011)Randomisation to protect agai…Improving the completeness and transparency of reports of randomized trials in oral health: the CONSORT statement. (2008)Improving the completeness an…Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by high impact factor medical journals: a survey of journal editors and journal 'Instructions to Authors' (2008)Endorsement of the CONSORT St…Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study (2008)Empirical evidence of bias in…Reporting research results: A moral obligation for all researchers (2007)Reporting research results: A…Reported methodological quality of split‐mouth studies (2007)Reported methodological quali…Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials (2007)Randomisation to protect agai…Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials (2007)Impact of allocation concealm…Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review (2006)Does the CONSORT checklist im…Quality of reporting randomised clinical trials in dental and medical research (2002)Quality of reporting randomis…Discussion Sections in Reports of Controlled Trials Published in General Medical Journals (1998)Discussion Sections in Report…Meta-analysis: Potentials and promise (1997)Meta-analysis: Potentials and…Quality assessment of randomized controlled trial abstracts on drug therapy of periodontal disease from the abstracts published in dental Science Citation Indexed journals in the last ten years (2020)Quality assessment of randomi…Reporting quality of randomised controlled trial abstracts presented at the SLEEP Annual Meetings: a cross-sectional study (2019)Reporting quality of randomis…Reporting quality of randomized controlled trial abstracts published in leading laser medicine journals: an assessment using the CONSORT for abstracts guidelines (2016)Reporting quality of randomiz…Reporting and Transparency in Big Data: The Nexus of Ethics and Methodology (2016)Reporting and Transparency in…Has the quality of reporting in periodontology changed in 14 years? A systematic review (2016)Has the quality of reporting …A practitioner's guide to developing critical appraisal skills (2013)A practitioner's guide to dev…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals (2012)COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (2021)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Assessing the quality of research (2004)Recommendations by Cochrane Review Groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies (2008)Understanding GRADE: an introduction (2013)Minimizing the Three Stages of Publication Bias (1990)Lost Science in the Third World (1995)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Clinical trials should begin and end with systematic reviews of relevant evidence: 12 years and waiting (2010)A Systematic Examination of the Citation of Prior Research in Reports of Randomized, Controlled Trials (2011)A generalized view of self-citation: Direct, co-author, collaborative, and coercive induced self-citation (2014)Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)Meta-analysis: Principles and procedures (1997)Cultural Differences in Ultimatum Game Experiments: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis (2004)Bias in Clinical Intervention Research (2006)Peer victimization and internalizing problems in children: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies (2010)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Effectiveness of Treatment Approaches for Children and Adolescents with Reading Disabilities: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (2014)Association Between Risk-of-Bias Assessments and Results of Randomized Trials in Cochrane Reviews: The ROBES Meta-Epidemiologic Study (2017)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Relation of completeness of reporting of health research to journals' endorsement of reporting guidelines: systematic review (2014)Selective reporting bias of harm outcomes within studies: findings from a cohort of systematic reviews (2014)Defining and Measuring Meditation-Related Adverse Effects in Mindfulness-Based Programs (2021)Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias) (2011)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Evidence-Based Medicine, Systematic Reviews, and Guidelines in Interventional Pain Management: Part 6. Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Observational Studies (2008)Basic study design influences the results of orthodontic clinical investigations (2015)SPIRIT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials (2025)Quality of Reporting in Abstracts of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Leading Journals of Periodontology and Implant Dentistry: A Survey (2012)Reporting quality of randomized controlled trial abstracts (2015)An assessment of quality characteristics of randomised control trials published in dental journals (2010)Comparison of intervention effects in split-mouth and parallel-arm randomized controlled trials: a meta-epidemiological study (2014)CONSORT 2010 statement: extension checklist for reporting within person randomised trials (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2008Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study2,534 cited
  • 2006Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review873 cited
  • 1997Meta-analysis: Potentials and promise646 cited
  • 2007Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials470 cited
  • 2011Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials439 cited
  • 2008Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by high impact factor medical journals: a survey of journal editors and journal 'Instructions to Authors'241 cited
  • 2007Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials189 cited
  • 1998Discussion Sections in Reports of Controlled Trials Published in General Medical Journals169 cited
  • 2007Reported methodological quality of split‐mouth studies122 cited
  • 2002Quality of reporting randomised clinical trials in dental and medical research69 cited
  • 2008Improving the completeness and transparency of reports of randomized trials in oral health: the CONSORT statement.60 cited
  • 2007Reporting research results: A moral obligation for all researchers60 cited

Cited by

  • 2019Reporting quality of randomised controlled trial abstracts presented at the SLEEP Annual Meetings: a cross-sectional study

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

20 cited
  • 2016Reporting quality of randomized controlled trial abstracts published in leading laser medicine journals: an assessment using the CONSORT for abstracts guidelines19 cited
  • 2016Has the quality of reporting in periodontology changed in 14 years? A systematic review12 cited
  • 2016Reporting and Transparency in Big Data: The Nexus of Ethics and Methodology11 cited
  • 2020Quality assessment of randomized controlled trial abstracts on drug therapy of periodontal disease from the abstracts published in dental Science Citation Indexed journals in the last ten years9 cited
  • 2013A practitioner's guide to developing critical appraisal skills6 cited