Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

To ‘feel good’, or to ‘do good’? Why we need institutional changes to ensure a results focus in Norwegian development assistance

12 references·2 citing·43 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1990Impure Altruism and Donations to Public Goods: A Theory of Warm-Glow Giving5,817 cited
2000Who Gives Foreign Aid to Whom and Why?2,585 cited
2006How Much Is a Seat on the Security Council Worth? Foreign Aid and Bribery at the United Nations801 cited
2006Bilateral Donors’ Interest vs. Recipients’ Development Motives in Aid Allocation: Do All Donors Behave the Same?624 cited
2002The cartel of good intentions: The problem of bureaucracy in foreign aid467 cited
2011Need, Merit, or Self‐Interest—What Determines the Allocation of Aid?397 cited
2007Are aid agencies improving?237 cited
2013Development Co-operation Report 201381 cited
2014OECD Development Co-operation Peer Reviews28 cited
2014Who cares about development outcomes? Market failures and the role of the evaluation function8 cited
2014Results measurement and evaluability: a comparative analysis7 cited
2009Assessing aid impact: a review of Norwegian evaluation practice7 cited

Cited by

2016Justifying development financing of small NGOs: impact evidence, political expedience and the case of the UK Civil Society Challenge Fund5 cited
2024What motivates South Korean Official Development Assistance?2 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work