The basic assumptions of E-Z Reader are not well-founded

Françoise Vitu

56 citations0/0 files storedBehavioral and Brain Sciences

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Reading and Literacy Development Visual perception and processing mechanisms Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

Abstract

This commentary focuses on the two basic assumptions of the E-Z Reader model, discussing the possibility that adjacent words in reading may be processed in parallel rather than serially, and presenting evidence against a cognitive control of eye guidance in reading.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 56 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2009Early parafoveal processing in reading Chinese sentences 2016The Influence of Content Meaningfulness on Eye Movements across Tasks: Evidence from Scene Viewing and Reading 2007A perceptual-economy account for the inverted-optimal viewing position effect.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.