Application of analytical hierarchy process to selection of primary crusher

Mohammad Javad Rahimdel · Mohammad Ataei

29 citations0/0 files storedInternational Journal of Mining Science and Technology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Multi-Criteria Decision Making Mineral Processing and Grinding Mining Techniques and Economics

Abstract

Selection of crusher required a great deal of design based on the mining plan and operation input. Selection of the best primary crusher from all of available primary crushers is a Multi-Criterion Decision Making (MCDM) problem. In this paper, the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method was used to selection of the best primary crusher for Golegohar Iron Mine in Iran. For this reason, gyratory, double toggle jaw, single toggle jaw, high speed roll crusher, low speed sizer, impactor, hammer mill and feeder breaker crushers were considered as alternatives and capacity, feed size, product size, rock compressive strength, abrasion index and mobility of crusher were considered as criteria. As a result of our study, the gyratory crusher was offered as the best primary crusher for the studied mine.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 29 citations exist upstream.

References

2006A decision support system using analytical hierarchy process (AHP) for the optimal environmental reclamation of an open-pit mine 2008A combined TOPSIS-AHP-method-based approach for non-traditional machining processes selection 2009A new approach to mining method selection based on modifying the Nicholas technique 2008Underground mining method selection by decision making tools 2004Mining method selection by multiple criteria decision making tools 2011A NEW FUZZY MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING MODEL FOR OPEN PIT MINES EQUIPMENT SELECTION 2011Determining proper strategies for Iran’s dimensional stone mines: a SWOT–AHP analysis 2011A MCDM Approach for Evaluating Bowlers Performance in IPL

Cited by

2023Addressing the supplier selection problem by using the analytical hierarchy process 2019An integrated constrained fuzzy stochastic analytic hierarchy process method with application to the choice problem 2016Alunite processing method selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment 2020Equipment selection in mineral processing - A sensitivity analysis approach for a fuzzy multiple criteria decision making model

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.