Narrated Relationships: Mothers-in-Law and Daughters-in-Law Justifying Conflicts in Taiwan's Chhan-chng

Abstract

In this study, I examined how mothers-in-law and daughters-in-law in Taiwan narrated relational conflicts. The data consisted of narrative practices that emerged from open-ended interviews with 16 mothers-in-law and their 16 daughters-in-law. These practices were analyzed as situated vocabularies of motives, negotiated in talk with the interviewer. Findings indicate that conflicts centered on the issue of daughters-in-law challenging the authority of their mother-in-law, hence violating the hierarchical structuring of this society. Mothers-in-law justified their motives as upholding the value of respecting elders even if elders acted in an unjust manner. Daughters-in-law justified their motives differently, saying that conflicts were the result of unintentional acts or the faults of elders. Agency was not entirely thwarted, as daughters-in-law possessed a range of means to indirectly express displeasure with their elders.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 28 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.