Comments on richards: The problems of ‘real’ geomorphology

K Bassett

13 citations0/0 files storedEarth Surface Processes and Landforms

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Historical Geography and Geographical Thought Philosophy and History of Science Geography and Environmental Studies

Abstract

Abstract A number of comments are made as a response to the editorial “Real” geomorphology' (Richards, 1990). The call for more involvement by geomorphologists in current philosophical debate is welcomed and the adoption of a broadly realist scientific approach is supported. Some contentious issues arise from this debate and these are outlined and discussed.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 13 citations exist upstream.

References

1983Representing and Intervening 1980The Scientific Image 2013A Realist Theory of Science 1982The Scientific Image.1983How the Laws of Physics Lie 1986Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach.1983How the Laws of Physics Lie 1989Laws and Symmetry

Cited by

1998Decoherence, Quantum Theory and their Implications for the Philosophy of Geomorphology 1998Griffith Taylor and the SE Australian highlands: issues of data sources and testability in interpretations of long‐term drainage history and landscape evolution 1999Methodology in Geomorphology: Traditions and Hypocrisy

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.