Grassroots Globalization and the Research Imagination

Abstract

Anxieties of the Globallobalization is certainly a source of anxiety in the U.S. academic world.And the sources of this anxiety are many: Social scientists (especially economists) worry about whether markets and deregulation produce greater wealth at the price of increased inequality.Political scientists worry that their field might vanish along with their favorite object, the nation-state, if globalization truly creates a "world without borders."Cultural theorists, especially cultural Marxists, worry that in spite of its conformity with everything they already knew about capital, there may be some embarrassing new possibilities for equity hidden in its workings.Historians, ever worried about the problem of the new, realize that globalization may not be a member of the familiar archive of large-scale historical shifts.And everyone in the academy is anxious to avoid seeming to be a mere publicist of the gigantic corporate machineries that celebrate globalization.Product differentiation is as important for (and within) the academy as it is for the corporations academics love to hate.Outside the academy there are quite different worries about globalization that include such questions as: What does globalization mean for labor markets and Public Culture 12(1): 1-19

Cite this

Arjun Appadurai (2000). Grassroots Globalization and the Research Imagination. Public Culture. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-12-1-1

@article{arjun2000grassroots,
  title  = {Grassroots Globalization and the Research Imagination},
  author = {Appadurai, Arjun},
  year   = {2000},
  journal = {Public Culture},
  doi    = {10.1215/08992363-12-1-1}
}

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 1,522 citations exist upstream.

References

Cited by