Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Accuracy of Population Validity and Cross-Validity Estimation: An Empirical Comparison of Formula-Based, Traditional Empirical, and Equal Weights Procedures

7 references·3 citing·35 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1969Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores8,023 cited
1971The Relative Efficiency of Regression and Simple Unit Predictor Weights in Applied Differential Psychology228 cited
1997Methodology Review: Estimation of Population Validity and Cross-Validity, and the Use of Equal Weights in Prediction94 cited
1977A Monte Carlo evaluation of three formula estimates of cross-validated multiple correlation.66 cited
1972A Comparison of Five Variable Weighting Procedures52 cited
1980Estimation in Multiple Correlation/Prediction49 cited
1969Phillip Justin Rulon (1900–1968)16 cited

Cited by

2023A simulation of the impacts of machine learning to combine psychometric employee selection system predictors on performance prediction, adverse impact, and number of dropped predictors22 cited
2011Choosing the Best Correction Formula for the Pearsonr2Effect Size13 cited
2011Tier One Performance Screen Initial Operational Test and Evaluation: 2010 Annual Report3 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work