Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

WHEN THE EXPERTS ARE UNCERTAIN: SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE AND THE ETHICS OF DEMOCRATIC JUDGMENT

16 references·6 citing·29 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1982Judgment under Uncertainty8,238 cited
1984Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.5,656 cited
1982Judgment under uncertainty: Causality and attribution4,616 cited
1984The Complete Works of Aristotle the Revised Oxford Translation2,382 cited
1996Virtues of the Mind2,241 cited
1999Knowledge in a Social World2,170 cited
2007Rethinking Expertise1,501 cited
2006Expert political judgment: how good is it? how can we know?1,260 cited
1985Epistemic Dependence924 cited
2001Experts: Which Ones Should You Trust?910 cited
2007Rethinking Expertise885 cited
2006The Epistemology of Democracy724 cited
2011SCIENCE IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY601 cited
2012Climate change and moral judgement546 cited
2009Democracy and Expertise505 cited
2012Epistemic Authority489 cited

Cited by

2014The ethics of scientific communication under uncertainty

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

141 cited

2017Public deliberation and the fact of expertise: making experts accountable93 cited

2023Citizen Knowledge80 cited

2022Why Think for Yourself?27 cited

2015‘A new and more rigorous approach’ to expert evidence in England and Wales?22 cited

2024Experts – Part I: What They Are and How to Identify Them21 cited