SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Scoring of medical publications with SIGAPS software: Application to orthopedics
5 references·7 citing·37 second hop
Scoring of medical publications with SIGAPS software: Application to orthopedics (2014)Scoring of medical publications with SIGA…How impact factors changed medical publishing—and science (2007)How impact factors changed me…An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)An index to quantify an indiv…SIGAPS a prototype of bibliographic tool for medical research evaluation (2003)SIGAPS a prototype of bibliog…Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality? (2003)Impact factor: a valid measur…Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Why the impact factor of jour…Global Trends in the Value of Author Order Across Medical Publications: A Cross‐Sectional Bibliometric Study (2025)Global Trends in the Value of…Bibliometric evaluation of negative publications from orthopedics and traumatology from the ten most influential journals of 2009–2010 and 2019–2020: A comparative study with the “Orthopedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research” journal, using the same analysis of submitted and accepted articles (2023)Bibliometric evaluation of ne…The association between research funding status and clinical research papers’ citation impact in Japan: A cross-sectional bibliometric study (2022)The association between resea…Rate of publication in predatory journals by orthopedic surgeons members of the French orthopedic and traumatology society (SOFCOT): A follow-up note (2020)Rate of publication in predat…Publication rate of studies presented at the French Arthroscopic Society Meeting in 2014 (2020)Publication rate of studies p…Importance of Quality Assessment in Clinical Research in Japan (2019)Importance of Quality Assessm…The Third French Alzheimer Plan: analysis of the influence of a national public health initiative on scientific research productivity and impact (2015)The Third French Alzheimer Pl…Journal impact factor: a brief review. (1999)Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor (2008)Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review (2008)Current concepts on bibliometrics: a brief review about impact factor, Eigenfactor score, CiteScore, SCImago Journal Rank, Source-Normalised Impact per Paper, H-index, and alternative metrics (2018)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)Publishing by—and for?—the Numbers (1990)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)Quality Versus Quantity: Assessing Individual Research Performance (2011)Alternatives to the journal impact factor: I3 and the top-10% (or top-25%?) of the most-highly cited papers (2012)The validation of (advanced) bibliometric indicators through peer assessments: A comparative study using data from InCites and F1000 (2013)Evolution of the Research Literature and the Scientific Community of Alzheimer’s Disease from 1983-2017: A 35-Year Survey (2020)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Does the h index have predictive power? (2007)The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (2018)The relationship between contributions of authors and author order (2021)Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison (2017)Predatory Publishing in Orthopaedic Research (2018)Scientific medical publication. Ongoing change benefits and risks: Predatory journals (2020)Predatory Journals in Orthopaedic Surgery (2023)Research on Predatory Publishing in Health Care: A Scoping Review (2023)Publication Bias in Editorial Decision Making (2002)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Dealing with the positive publication bias: Why you should really publish your negative results (2017)Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals (2015)Trends and comparison of female first authorship in high impact medical journals: observational study (1994-2014) (2016)Robustesse du score SIGAPS, critère bibliométrique pour valoriser les publications des établissements de santé (2009)Existe-t-il une corrélation entre le score SIGAPS et les publications en français ? (2012)Modèle de valorisation des publications médicales scientifiques : le logiciel SIGAPS (2014)A combined bibliometric indicator to predict article impact (2010)Impact factors, scientometrics and the history of citation-based research (2012)Accounting for Impact? The Journal Impact Factor and the Making of Biomedical Research in the Netherlands (2015)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output11,612 cited
  • 1997Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research2,444 cited
  • 2003Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality?584 cited
  • 2007How impact factors changed medical publishing—and science129 cited
  • 2003SIGAPS a prototype of bibliographic tool for medical research evaluation36 cited

Cited by

  • 2020Rate of publication in predatory journals by orthopedic surgeons members of the French orthopedic and traumatology society (SOFCOT): A follow-up note19 cited
  • 2019Importance of Quality Assessment in Clinical Research in Japan14 cited
  • 2023Bibliometric evaluation of negative publications from orthopedics and traumatology from the ten most influential journals of 2009–2010 and 2019–2020: A comparative study with the “Orthopedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research” journal, using the same analysis of submitted and accepted articles13 cited
  • 2015The Third French Alzheimer Plan: analysis of the influence of a national public health initiative on scientific research productivity and impact12 cited
  • 2025Global Trends in the Value of Author Order Across Medical Publications: A Cross‐Sectional Bibliometric Study11 cited
  • 2020Publication rate of studies presented at the French Arthroscopic Society Meeting in 201411 cited
  • 2022The association between research funding status and clinical research papers’ citation impact in Japan: A cross-sectional bibliometric study9 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work