SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
CONSORT item adherence in top ranked anaesthesiology journals in 2011
15 references·1 citing·40 second hop
CONSORT item adherence in top ranked anaesthesiology journals in 2011 (2014)CONSORT item adherence in top ranked anae…Quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials published in Intensive Care Medicine from 2001 to 2010 (2013)Quality of reporting of rando…Effect of editors' implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series analysis (2012)Effect of editors' implementa…Assessment of adherence to the CONSORT statement for quality of reports on randomized controlled trial abstracts from four high-impact general medical journals (2012)Assessment of adherence to th…The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: comparative study of articles indexed in PubMed (2010)The quality of reports of ran…Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes (2010)Reporting and Interpretation …Has the quality of abstracts for randomised controlled trials improved since the release of Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trial guideline for abstract reporting? A survey of four high-profile anaesthesia journals (2010)Has the quality of abstracts …CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and …The quality of randomized trial reporting in leading medical journals since the revised CONSORT statement (2005)The quality of randomized tri…Bad reporting does not mean bad methods for randomised trials: observational study of randomised controlled trials performed by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (2004)Bad reporting does not mean b…Discrepancy between published report and actual conduct of randomized clinical trials (2002)Discrepancy between published…Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Assessing the quality of cont…CONSORT: An Evolving Tool to Help Improve the Quality of Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials (1998)CONSORT: An Evolving Tool to …Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Improving the quality of repo…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the Quality of Repo…Reporting of planned statistical methods in published surgical randomised trial protocols: a protocol for a methodological systematic review (2016)Reporting of planned statisti…The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Does Cultural Competency Training of Health Professionals Improve Patient Outcomes? A Systematic Review and Proposed Algorithm for Future Research (2010)Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? (2010)Evolution of Reporting P Values in the Biomedical Literature, 1990-2015 (2016)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)Mejorar la comunicación de estudios observacionales en epidemiología (STROBE): explicación y elaboración (2009)Psychological interventions for antisocial personality disorder (2010)CONSORT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials (2025)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Collaborative care for depression in primary care (2006)CEC’s Standards for Classifying the Evidence Base of Practices in Special Education (2014)Dyadic coping and relationship functioning in couples coping with cancer: A systematic review (2014)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2011)How evidence-based is an 'evidence-based parenting program'? A PRISMA systematic review and meta-analysis of Triple P (2012)The CARE Guidelines: Consensus-based Clinical Case Report Guideline Development (2013)Effectiveness of music therapy: a summary of systematic reviews based on randomized controlled trials of music interventions (2014)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): Explanation and Elaboration (2015)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies: The CHARMS Checklist (2014)The CONSORT statement (2019)COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (2021)CONSORT 2010 Statement (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. (2010)Effect of Preventive Interventions in Mentally Ill Parents on the Mental Health of the Offspring: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2011)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials9,314 cited
  • 1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
  • 2001Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials3,309 cited
  • 1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials1,858 cited
  • 2010Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes828 cited
  • 2010The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: comparative study of articles indexed in PubMed503 cited
  • 2004Bad reporting does not mean bad methods for randomised trials: observational study of randomised controlled trials performed by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group313 cited
  • 1998CONSORT: An Evolving Tool to Help Improve the Quality of Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials241 cited
  • 2012Effect of editors' implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series analysis235 cited
  • 2005The quality of randomized trial reporting in leading medical journals since the revised CONSORT statement216 cited
  • 2012Assessment of adherence to the CONSORT statement for quality of reports on randomized controlled trial abstracts from four high-impact general medical journals140 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2002
Discrepancy between published report and actual conduct of randomized clinical trials
111 cited
  • 2010Has the quality of abstracts for randomised controlled trials improved since the release of Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trial guideline for abstract reporting? A survey of four high-profile anaesthesia journals89 cited
  • 2013Quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials published in Intensive Care Medicine from 2001 to 201043 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2016Reporting of planned statistical methods in published surgical randomised trial protocols: a protocol for a methodological systematic review13 cited