Integrating top-down and bottom-up structural models of subjective well-being: A longitudinal investigation.

Abstract

Although there have been many recent advances in the literature on subjective well-being (SWB), the field historically has suffered from two shortcomings: little theoretical progress and lack of quasiexperimental or longitudinal design (E. Diener, 1984). Causal influences therefore have been difficult to determine. After collecting data over four time periods with 160 Ss we compared how well two alternative models of SWB (bottom-up and top-down models) fit the data. Variables of interest in both models were physical health, daily hassles, world assumptions, and constructive thinking. Results showed that both models provided good fit to the data, with neither model providing a closer fit than the other, which suggests that the field would benefit from devoting more time to examining how general dispositions toward happiness color perceptions of life's experiences. Results implicate bidirectional causal models of SWB and its personality and situational influences

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 269 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.