On the Validity of the Portable Rod-and-Frame Test

Doug Irving

5 citations0/0 files storedPerceptual and Motor Skills

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Psychological Testing and Assessment Visual perception and processing mechanisms Spatial Cognition and Navigation

Abstract

Kato (1965) and Morris (1967) have reported correlations between stationary Rod-and-frame Tests (RFT; Witkin, Lewis, Hertzman, Machover, Meissner, & Wapner, 1954) and portable versions of their own design of .77 and .74, respectively. However, Vaught (1969) reports a correlation between a commercially available version and a stationary RFT of .44 for men, .41 for women, and .46 over-all.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 5 citations exist upstream.

References

1955Personality through Perception 1968The Rod-and-Frame Test: Some Comments on Methodology 1965THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF NEW ROD FRAME TEST 1969Correlations between Scores for a Portable RFT and a Stationary RFT

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.