An empirical and meta-analytic evaluation of the phoneme identification task.

Mark A. Pitt · Arthur G. Samuel

101 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Phonetics and Phonology Research Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism Neuroscience and Music Perception

Abstract

Recent studies that used Ganong's (1980) identification task have produced discrepant results. The present study sought to resolve these discrepancies by examining the influence of methodological factors on phoneme identification and differences in data analysis techniques. Three factors were examined across 2 experiments: position of target phoneme, phonetic contrast, and 2 task conditions in which stimulus quality (S/N ratio) or cognitive load varied. A meta-analysis was then performed on the results from all identification studies, including the present one, in an effort to obtain additional insight on factors that influence the task. The experiments and meta-analysis identified the importance of several methodological factors in affecting identification, most notably position of the target phoneme.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 101 citations exist upstream.

References

2016Perception and Production of Fluent Speech 1975Structure and Process in Speech Perception

Cited by

2008Acoustic covariants of length contrast in Japanese stops 2007A study of regressive place assimilation in spontaneous speech and its implications for spoken word recognition 2004Lexical Influences in Audiovisual Speech Perception.2008Effects of Attention on the Strength of Lexical Influences on Speech Perception: Behavioral Experiments and Computational Mechanisms 1999Effect of lexical status on children's and adults' perception of native and non-native vowels 1994Vertical similarity in spoken word recognition: Multiple lexical activation, individual differences, and the role of sentence context 2001Contextual influences on the internal structure of phonetic categories: A distinction between lexical status and speaking rate 2009How are pronunciation variants of spoken words recognized? A test of generalization to newly learned words

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.