SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Cohort study of trials submitted to ethics committee identified discrepant reporting of outcomes in publications
16 references·7 citing·38 second hop
Cohort study of trials submitted to ethics committee identified discrepant reporting of outcomes in publications (2013)Cohort study of trials submitted to ethic…Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials (2011)Comparison of protocols and r…CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and …Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results (2009)Publication bias in clinical …Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials (2009)Comparison of Registered and …Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors (2005)Identifying outcome reporting…Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (2004)Outcome reporting bias in ran…Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Empirical Evidence for Select…Reported Methodologic Quality and Discrepancies between Large and Small Randomized Trials in Meta-Analyses (2001)Reported Methodologic Quality…meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies (1998)meta-analysis bias in locatio…Withholding Research Results in Academic Life Science (1997)Withholding Research Results …Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects (1997)Publication bias: evidence of…The CONSORT Statement (1996)The CONSORT StatementImproving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Improving the quality of repo…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the Quality of Repo…Factors Influencing Publication of Research Results (1992)Factors Influencing Publicati…Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Publication bias in clinical …Time to publication for results of clinical trials (2024)Time to publication for resul…Unrestricted weighted least squares represent medical research better than random effects in 67,308 Cochrane meta-analyses (2023)Unrestricted weighted least s…Peer review before trial conduct could increase research value and reduce waste (2023)Peer review before trial cond…Impact of searching clinical trials registers in systematic reviews of pharmaceutical and non‐pharmaceutical interventions: Reanalysis of meta‐analyses (2022)Impact of searching clinical …Estimating the prevalence of discrepancies between study registrations and publications: A systematic review and meta-analyses (2021)Estimating the prevalence of …Statistical controversies in clinical research: comparison of primary outcomes in protocols, public clinical-trial registries and publications: the example of oncology trials (2016)Statistical controversies in …Evidence of nicotine replacement's effectiveness dissolves when meta-regression accommodates multiple sources of bias (2016)Evidence of nicotine replacem…Publication Bias: A Problem in Interpreting Medical Data (1988)The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence (1990)The Effect of School Resources on Student Achievement (1996)A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. (2006)Publication Decisions and their Possible Effects on Inferences Drawn from Tests of Significance—or Vice Versa (1959)Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses? (2000)Screen time and sleep among school-aged children and adolescents: A systematic literature review (2014)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)A Nonparametric "Trim and Fill" Method of Accounting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis (2000)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)Chapter 9: Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta-Analyses (2008)Analysing data and undertaking meta‐analyses (2019)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis (2007)Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry (2008)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German (1997)How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study (2003)Sex Differences in Insomnia: A Meta-Analysis (2006)Application of systematic review methodology to food and feed safety assessments to support decision making (2010)Stopping Randomized Trials Early for Benefit and Estimation of Treatment Effects Systematic Review and Meta-regression Analysis (2010)Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomised controlled trials: combined analysis of meta-epidemiological studies. (2012)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials8,873 cited
  • 1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
  • 1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
  • 1991Publication bias in clinical research3,110 cited
  • 2001Reported Methodologic Quality and Discrepancies between Large and Small Randomized Trials in Meta-Analyses2,285 cited
  • 2004Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials1,845 cited
  • 1998meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies1,370 cited
  • 2009Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results897 cited
  • 1992Factors Influencing Publication of Research Results853 cited
  • 1997Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects820 cited
  • 1996The CONSORT Statement736 cited
  • 2009Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials728 cited
  • 2005Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors612 cited
  • 1997Withholding Research Results in Academic Life Science605 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2004Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research442 cited
  • 2011Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials243 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2024Time to publication for results of clinical trials31 cited
    • 2016Statistical controversies in clinical research: comparison of primary outcomes in protocols, public clinical-trial registries and publications: the example of oncology trials31 cited
    • 2021Estimating the prevalence of discrepancies between study registrations and publications: A systematic review and meta-analyses18 cited
    • 2016Evidence of nicotine replacement's effectiveness dissolves when meta-regression accommodates multiple sources of bias17 cited
    • 2023Unrestricted weighted least squares represent medical research better than random effects in 67,308 Cochrane meta-analyses15 cited
    • 2022Impact of searching clinical trials registers in systematic reviews of pharmaceutical and non‐pharmaceutical interventions: Reanalysis of meta‐analyses15 cited
    • 2023Peer review before trial conduct could increase research value and reduce waste10 cited