Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Judging interevent contingencies: Being right for the wrong reasons

10 references·6 citing·39 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1958The growth of logical thinking: From childhood to adolescence.4,604 cited
1967Attribution theory in social psychology3,831 cited
1979Judgment of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: Sadder but wiser?1,691 cited
1965The display of information and the judgment of contingency.311 cited
1983Estimates of contingency between two dichotomous variables.191 cited
1980The judgment of contingency and the nature of the response alternatives.139 cited
1980A rule analysis of judgments of covariation between events107 cited
1983Human covariation judgment: Accuracy and strategy50 cited
1984Judging response-outcome relations: The role of response-outcome contingency, outcome probability, and method of information presentation26 cited
1972The empirical implications of piaget's concept of correlation24 cited

Cited by

2014Goal-driven reasoning overcomes cell D neglect in contingency judgements13 cited
2001Hypothesis Testing and the Perception of Diagnosticity11 cited
2020The effects of numeracy and presentation format on judgments of contingency6 cited
2016Judgment of Covariation: A Review3 cited
2001Formation and use of covariation assessments in the real world

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2 cited

2024Prediction-comprehension bias: Successful prediction can promote an illusory sense of comprehension2 cited