The idea of rhetoric as interpretive practice: A humanist's response to Gaonkar

Abstract

This response focuses on Gaonkar's binary contrast between the productive/performative function of classical rhetoric and the theoretical/interpretative function of contemporary rhetoric. The key to this distinction rests in what Gaonkar calls the “ideology of human agency” implicit in classical rhetoric. A close reading of his essay reveals that, in theory, Gaonkar does not eliminate this “ideology” but merely shifts it from the performer/producer to the interpreter. In practice, however, Gaonkar's reading of disciplinary history indicates a more satisfactory position—one that allows a more fluid relationship between production and interpretation.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 30 citations exist upstream.