Smart density: a more accurate method of measuring rural residential density for health-related research

Peter M. Owens · Linda T. Titus-Ernstoff · Lucinda Gibson · Michael L. Beach · Sandy Beauregard · Madeline A. Dalton

26 citations0/0 files storedInternational Journal of Health Geographics

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Urban Transport and Accessibility Urban Design and Spatial Analysis Urban Green Space and Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies involving the built environment have typically relied on US Census data to measure residential density. However, census geographic units are often unsuited to health-related research, especially in rural areas where development is clustered and discontinuous. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the accuracy of both standard census methods and alternative GIS-based methods to measure rural density. METHODS: We compared residential density (units/acre) in 335 Vermont school neighborhoods using conventional census geographic units (tract, block group and block) with two GIS buffer measures: a 1-kilometer (km) circle around the school and a 1-km circle intersected with a 100-meter (m) road-network buffer. The accuracy of each method was validated against the actual residential density for each neighborhood based on the Vermont e911 database, which provides an exact geo-location for all residential structures in the state. RESULTS: Standard census measures underestimate residential density in rural areas. In addition, the degree of error is inconsistent so even the relative rank of neighborhood densities varies across census measures. Census measures explain only 61% to 66% of the variation in actual residential density. In contrast, GIS buffer measures explain approximately 90% of the variation. Combining a 1-km circle with a road-network buffer provides the closest approximation of actual residential density. CONCLUSION: Residential density based on census units can mask clusters of development in rural areas and distort associations between residential density and health-related behaviors and outcomes. GIS-defined buffers, including a 1-km circle and a road-network buffer, can be used in conjunction with census data to obtain a more accurate measure of residential density.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 26 citations exist upstream.

References

2003Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: Findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures 2003Neighborhood-Based Differences in Physical Activity: An Environment Scale Evaluation 2001Travel and the Built Environment: A Synthesis 2004Obesity relationships with community design, physical activity, and time spent in cars 2003Relationship between Urban Sprawl and Physical Activity, Obesity, and Morbidity 2007The Built Environment and Obesity 1994Impacts of Mixed Use and Density on Utilization of Three Modes of Travel: Single-Occupant Vehicle, Transit, and Walking 2005Obesity and the Built Environment

Cited by

2012Road density as a proxy for population density in regional-scale risk modeling 2025Exploring the complex associations between community public spaces and healthy aging: an explainable analysis using catboost and SHAP 2024Changing associations of built environment with usage of urban space due to the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.