Retractions: Guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)

Elizabeth Wager · Virginia Barbour · S. M. Yentis · Sabine Kleinert

67 citations0/0 files storedCroatian Medical Journal

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Academic integrity and plagiarism Publishing and Scholarly Communication Academic Publishing and Open Access

Abstract

they have clear evidence that the findings are unreliable, either as a result of misconduct (eg, data fabrication) or honest error (eg, miscalculation or experimental error)

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 67 citations exist upstream.

References

2006Retractions in the research literature: misconduct or mistakes?

Cited by

2017An analysis of the validity of retraction annotation in pubmed and the web of science 2019Post retraction citations among manuscripts reporting a radiology-imaging diagnostic method 2023A systematic review of retractions in biomedical research publications: reasons for retractions and their citations in Indian affiliations 2023Characteristics of retracted publications related to pain research: a systematic review 2021Retractions and post-retraction citations in the COVID-19 infodemic 2010Editors as gatekeepers of responsible science 2020For how long and with what relevance do genetics articles retracted due to research misconduct remain active in the scientific literature 2017Truths, lies, and statistics

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.