Landscapes of Property

Abstract

If we want to explore the social dimensions of property, we need to think of it not only historically but also geographically, entailing both practices in and representations of social space. The concept of landscape is a useful bridging device here, given its double meaning as both a material space and as a particular way of seeing space. Landscapes, in both senses, can serve to reify and naturalize dominant property relations but can also serve as spaces of contestation. Such landscapes, however, cannot be disentangled from the places in which they are positioned. I use this framework to make sense of resistance to gentrification in the Downtown Eastside of Vancouver, Canada, a poor neighborhood with a rich history of activism. A collective property claim by the poor has been staked out through the material use, production, and representation of an urban landscape. Such local meanings and practices, however, are threatened by “outsiders,” who are seen to map and use this landscape in very different ways.

Cite this

NICHOLAS K. BLOMLEY (1998). Landscapes of Property. Law & Society Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/827757

@article{k1998landscapes,
  title  = {Landscapes of Property},
  author = {BLOMLEY, NICHOLAS K.},
  year   = {1998},
  journal = {Law & Society Review},
  doi    = {10.2307/827757}
}

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 121 citations exist upstream.

References

Cited by