Recalcitrant space: modeling variation in humanistic geography

Unknown author

3 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Cultural Geography

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Spatial and Cultural Studies Historical Geography and Geographical Thought Place Attachment and Urban Studies

Abstract

In the past decade humanistic geography has been roundly criticized by influential geographers for offering essentialist conceptions of place. In this paper it is argued that essentialism is not intrinsic to these conceptions, and a model of ‘recalcitrant space’ is presented to show how amenable humanistic geographies are to constructivist adaptations that foreground variation in subjective encounters with place.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 3 citations exist upstream.

References

1978Place and Placelessness 1978Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience.2007Space, place and gender 1979Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience 1978Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience 2009Social Justice and the City 2012Place: A Short Introduction 1975Social Justice and the City

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.