SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
An Analysis of the EEOCC “Four-Fifths” Rule
0 references·5 citing·14 second hop
An Analysis of the EEOCC “Four-Fifths” Rule (1979)An Analysis of the EEOCC “Four-Fifths” Ru…Properties of statistical tests appropriate for the analysis of data in disparate impact cases (2013)Properties of statistical tes…Modeling the behavior of the 4/5ths rule for determining adverse impact: Reasons for caution. (2006)Modeling the behavior of the …THE FOUR-FIFTHS RULE FOR ASSESSING ADVERSE IMPACT: AN ARITHMETIC, INTUITIVE, AND LOGICAL ANALYSIS OF THE RULE AND IMPLICATIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH AND PRACTICE (2004)THE FOUR-FIFTHS RULE FOR ASSE…SIGNIFICANCE TESTS AND CONFIDENCE INTERVALS FOR THE ADVERSE IMPACT RATIO (2000)SIGNIFICANCE TESTS AND CONFID…Another Analysis of the EEOCC “Four-Fifths” Rule (1979)Another Analysis of the EEOCC…Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance. (1984)The earth is round (p < .05). (1994)The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. (1998)Personality and its assessment in organizations: Theoretical and empirical developments. (2010)Belief in the law of small numbers. (1971)THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY TRAITS, GENERAL MENTAL ABILITY, AND CAREER SUCCESS ACROSS THE LIFE SPAN (1999)Not Seeing Clearly With Cleary: What Test Bias Analyses Do and Do Not Tell Us (2010)“Give us your social networking site passwords”: Implications for personnel selection and personality (2014)Differential Pass-Fail Rates in Employment Testing: Statistical Proof under Title VII (1978)Testing for adverse impact when sample size is small. (2008)Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. (1977)Choices, values, and frames. (1984)Choices, Values, and Frames (2013)The Legal Context of the Management of Human Resources (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2006Modeling the behavior of the 4/5ths rule for determining adverse impact: Reasons for caution.58 cited
  • 2000SIGNIFICANCE TESTS AND CONFIDENCE INTERVALS FOR THE ADVERSE IMPACT RATIO58 cited
  • 2004THE FOUR-FIFTHS RULE FOR ASSESSING ADVERSE IMPACT: AN ARITHMETIC, INTUITIVE, AND LOGICAL ANALYSIS OF THE RULE AND IMPLICATIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH AND PRACTICE26 cited
  • 1979Another Analysis of the EEOCC “Four-Fifths” Rule16 cited
  • 2013Properties of statistical tests appropriate for the analysis of data in disparate impact cases9 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work