SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
An analytic hierarchy process model to apportion co-author responsibility
9 references·3 citing·42 second hop
An analytic hierarchy process model to apportion co-author responsibility (2006)An analytic hierarchy process model to ap…Analytic Hierarchy Process (2013)Analytic Hierarchy ProcessWho did what? Authorship and contribution in 2001 (2001)Who did what? Authorship and …Authorship: rules, rights, responsibilities and recommendations. (2000)Authorship: rules, rights, re…The authorship list in science: Junior physicists’ perceptions of who appears and why (1999)The authorship list in scienc…When Authorship Fails (1997)When Authorship FailsWhen Authorship Fails (1997)When Authorship FailsA proposal for a new system of credit allocation in science (1997)A proposal for a new system o…The Analytic Hierarchy Process (1985)The Analytic Hierarchy ProcessDecision making for leaders (1985)Decision making for leadersAddressing authorship dilemmas in scholarly publications: a solution-oriented study (2024)Addressing authorship dilemma…The CalculAuthor: determining authorship using a simple-to-use, fair, objective, and transparent process (2023)The CalculAuthor: determining…A Survey-Weighted Analytic Hierarchy Process to Quantify Authorship (2021)A Survey-Weighted Analytic Hi…Little Science, Big Science (1963)Patterns of Name Ordering Among Authors of Scientific Papers: A Study of Social Symbolism and Its Ambiguity (1968)The Contributions of Authors to Multiauthored Biomedical Research Papers (1994)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit (2015)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Betrayers of the Truth (1982)Irresponsible Authorship and Wasteful Publication (1986)Stealing into Print (1992)The Price of Truth (2007)Influences on Authorship Issues: An Evaluation of Receiving, Not Receiving, and Rejecting Credit (2010)Researchers’ Perceptions of Ethical Authorship Distribution in Collaborative Research Teams (2019)Nobel Laureates in Science: Patterns of Productivity, Collaboration, and Authorship (1967)Chronicle of Higher Education (1996)Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals (1997)Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future directions (2006)Perceptions of authorship criteria: effects of student instruction and scientific experience (2007)Ratio scales and category scales for a dozen perceptual continua. (1957)Theory and Methods of Scaling (1959)A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures (1977)Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP (1996)Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications (2004)Axiomatic Foundation of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (1986)Prediction, Projection and Forecasting (1991)The Analytic Network Process: Decision Making With Dependence and Feedback (2001)Decision making — the Analytic Hierarchy and Network Processes (AHP/ANP) (2004)Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators (2005)Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide (2008)A Systematic Review of Research on the Meaning, Ethics and Practices of Authorship across Scholarly Disciplines (2011)Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals (2015)Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication (2018)What can we learn from the Hwang and Sudbø affairs? (2006)Ethical Issues in Multiple-Authored and Mentor-Supervised Publications (2011)Publishing Without Perishing: A Guide to the Successful Reporting of Clinical Data (2019)The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used (1987)How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process (1990)Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning—A review (2004)Social enterprise and social entrepreneurship research and theory (2011)Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship: the-state-of-the-art (2012)Responsibility for scientific misconduct in collaborative papers (2017)Why do Some Countries Publish More Than Others? An International Comparison of Research Funding, English Proficiency and Publication Output in Highly Ranked General Medical Journals (2004)How can we ensure visibility and diversity in research contributions? How the Contributor Role Taxonomy (CRediT) is helping the shift from authorship to contributorship (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1985The Analytic Hierarchy Process15,407 cited
  • 2013Analytic Hierarchy Process5,624 cited
  • 1985Decision making for leaders1,342 cited
  • 1997When Authorship Fails685 cited
  • 1997When Authorship Fails401 cited
  • 1997A proposal for a new system of credit allocation in science85 cited
  • 2001Who did what? Authorship and contribution in 200145 cited
  • 1999The authorship list in science: Junior physicists’ perceptions of who appears and why43 cited
  • 2000Authorship: rules, rights, responsibilities and recommendations.28 cited

Cited by

  • 2023The CalculAuthor: determining authorship using a simple-to-use, fair, objective, and transparent process12 cited
  • 2024Addressing authorship dilemmas in scholarly publications: a solution-oriented study11 cited
  • 2021A Survey-Weighted Analytic Hierarchy Process to Quantify Authorship10 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work