2. THE PUBLIC RELEVANCE OF HISTORICAL STUDIES: A REPLY TO DIRK MOSES

Hayden White

104 citations0/0 files storedHistory and Theory

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Philosophy, History, and Historiography Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy German Social Sciences and History

Abstract

I am grateful to Dirk Moses for taking the time to study my work so assiduously and to comment on it so perspicuously. His essay is eminently well-informed and even-handed, and I have little to add to or correct of his characterization of my many, long on-going, and admittedly flawed attempts to deconstruct modern historical discourse. He understands me well enough and I think that I understand his objections to my position(s). We do not disagree on matters of fact, I think, but we have different notions about the nature of historical discourse and the uses to which historical knowledge can properly be put.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 104 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2013Breaking up Time – Negotiating the Borders between Present, Past and Future. An Introduction 2013Above, about and beyond the writing of history: a retrospective view of Hayden White'sMetahistoryon the 40th anniversary of its publication 2018Work, Wealth, and Postmodernism 2008‘Nobody does it better’: radical history and Hayden White 2022Vinho novo: história e novas perspectivas

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.