SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Reporting a Systematic Review
16 references·0 citing·28 second hop
Reporting a Systematic Review (2010)Reporting a Systematic ReviewThe PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Repo…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Chapter 9: Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta-Analyses (2008)Chapter 9: Analysing Data and…Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies (2008)Chapter 8: Assessing risk of …Grey literature in meta-analyses of randomized trials of health care interventions (2007)Grey literature in meta-analy…Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)Epidemiology and Reporting Ch…Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)Development of AMSTAR: a meas…Publication and Related Biases (2001)Publication and Related BiasesDoes the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses? (2000)Does the inclusion of grey li…Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Improving the quality of repo…Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions (1997)Systematic Reviews: Synthesis…Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists (1995)Assessing the quality of rand…The Cochrane Collaboration: Preparing, Maintaining, and Disseminating Systematic Reviews of the Effects of Health Care (1993)The Cochrane Collaboration: P…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Summarizing systematic reviews (2015)Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS) (2016)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Collaborative care for depression and anxiety problems (2012)Basics of meta‐analysis: I 2 is not an absolute measure of heterogeneity (2017)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2008)Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews (2014)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement63,979 cited
  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.44,857 cited
  • 2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration28,094 cited
  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
  • 1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
  • 2007Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews4,376 cited
  • 2008Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies3,791 cited
  • 2008Chapter 9: Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta-Analyses2,780 cited
  • 1997Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions2,184 cited
  • 1995Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists1,306 cited
  • 2007Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews891 cited
  • 2000Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses?811 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2007
Grey literature in meta-analyses of randomized trials of health care interventions
598 cited
  • 1993The Cochrane Collaboration: Preparing, Maintaining, and Disseminating Systematic Reviews of the Effects of Health Care562 cited
  • 2001Publication and Related Biases465 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.